[hibernate-dev] [Search] Spatial still experimental

Sanne Grinovero sanne at hibernate.org
Thu Dec 19 11:36:49 EST 2013


nice, thanks all. Optimistically labelled these issues as 5.0

Also, there are other issues open already which suggested API
improvements: so while indeed the API isn't new anymore, we haven't
properly incorporated all feedback.

Looks like we all agree it stays experimental for now.

On 19 December 2013 15:21, Emmanuel Bernard <emmanuel at hibernate.org> wrote:
> https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/HSEARCH-1469
> https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/HSEARCH-1470
>
>
> On Thu 2013-12-19 12:36, Hardy Ferentschik wrote:
>>
>> On 16 Jan 2013, at 08:32, Emmanuel Bernard <emmanuel at hibernate.org> wrote:
>>
>> > - spatial as a name is a bit fuzzy, should we change it? I tend to use
>> >  geolocation maybe geoquery when I try to explain the notion.
>>
>> not sure. IMO spatial is the right term. I find relocation less appealing, but better than geoquery which
>> gets a -1
>>
>> > - in the DSL should we rename onCoordinates with onCoordinatesField or
>> >  even onSpatialField?
>>
>> +1 for on spatialField
>>
>> > - I frequently makes the mistake of writing my spatial query without
>> >  setting up the index. We might want to try and make that error message
>> >  as descriptove as possible.
>>
>> +1
>>
>> > - Lucene 4 comes with the notion of spatial queries supporting shapes.
>> >  We should experiment with the DSL to see if that notion can be safely
>> >  added. (I think it does at least on the DSL side).
>>
>> +1
>>
>> —hardy
> _______________________________________________
> hibernate-dev mailing list
> hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev



More information about the hibernate-dev mailing list