[hibernate-dev] ORM 3 JIRA tickets

[Hardy Ferentschik]

Nice. I think the approach makes sense in our current situation, and I also like that we clearly explain 
what we are trying to do and why.

Good stuff.

—Hardy



On 1 Jan 2014, at 20:04, Brett Meyer <brmeyer at redhat.com> wrote:

> All, here's the write up.  Comments appreciated!
> 
> http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/HibernateORMJIRAPoliciesAndCleanUpTactics
> 
> Brett Meyer
> Red Hat, Hibernate ORM
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Steve Ebersole" <steve at hibernate.org>
> To: "Brett Meyer" <brmeyer at redhat.com>
> Cc: "Hardy Ferentschik" <hardy at hibernate.org>, "Hibernate" <hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 4:01:38 PM
> Subject: Re: [hibernate-dev] ORM 3 JIRA tickets
> 
> Probably not a bad idea to write up a blog describing what we are doing and
> why.  We could link to that in the Jira comment
> 
> 
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Brett Meyer <brmeyer at redhat.com> wrote:
> 
>>> I guess you would still include some features/improvements issues
>> 
>> I'm sure some legitimate things may get caught up in this, but I'd rather
>> try to clean things up aggressively, then re-open on a case-by-case basis.
>> If there's something we close that the community feels strongly about, the
>> hope is that they'll comment on it and bring it to our attention.
>> 
>> Brett Meyer
>> Red Hat, Hibernate ORM
>> 
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Hardy Ferentschik" <hardy at hibernate.org>
>> To: "Brett Meyer" <brmeyer at redhat.com>
>> Cc: "Hibernate" <hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>> Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 3:40:55 PM
>> Subject: Re: [hibernate-dev] ORM 3 JIRA tickets
>> 
>> 
>> On 31 Jan 2014, at 21:09, Brett Meyer <brmeyer at redhat.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Recently, we've been trying to clean up ORM's JIRA tickets.  There are a
>> lot of duplication, stale issues, etc.  One thought was pushing all ORM 3
>> tickets to the "Awaiting Test Case" state and requesting a reproducer on
>> ORM 4 or 5.  They would then fall under our policy of automatically
>> rejecting those tickets that did not receive a test case within 3 months or
>> so.
>> 
>> Sounds like a fair attempt to try to get a grip on all these open issues.
>> 
>>> This obviously would not include new features/improvements, anything
>> assigned to someone, etc.
>> 
>> I guess you would still include some features/improvements issues, since
>> Bug is the default issue type and some people don't change the type
>> even so they describe a feature/improvement. But that might not be
>> important.
>> 
>> --Hardy
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> hibernate-dev mailing list
>> hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>>