[hibernate-dev] [OGM] OGM and Bean Validation

Emmanuel Bernard emmanuel at hibernate.org
Wed Apr 2 18:06:16 EDT 2014


It’s actually a PITA even in JPA. I wish ConstraintViolationExceptions were not wrapped at all.

On 03 Apr 2014, at 00:00, Gunnar Morling <gunnar at hibernate.org> wrote:

> Hum, I guess it's one of the cases then where JPA doesn't 100% match for the purposes of talking to NoSQL.
> 
> 
> 2014-04-02 17:40 GMT+02:00 Emmanuel Bernard <emmanuel at hibernate.org>:
> This would go against the JPA spec unfortunately.
> 
> On 02 Apr 2014, at 16:25, Gunnar Morling <gunnar at hibernate.org> wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> > Working on a demo for OGM, I tried to apply Bean Validation constraints to
> > my entities and have them automatically validated during the persistence
> > lifecycle.
> >
> > This works as expected (which is very nice), the only thing which made me
> > wonder is that the resulting ConstraintViolationException is wrapped into a
> > RollbackException. Basically that's not surprising as we use TX demarcation
> > to control the flush cycle also if the store is actually non-transactional,
> > yet it may cause irritations and false expectations by users.
> >
> > So I'm wondering whether we rather should raise a more generic
> > PersistenceException (or another specialized type which doesn't indicate a
> > rollback may happen) when using a non-transactional backend? What do you
> > think?
> >
> > --Gunnar
> > _______________________________________________
> > hibernate-dev mailing list
> > hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
> 
> _______________________________________________
> hibernate-dev mailing list
> hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
> 



More information about the hibernate-dev mailing list