[hibernate-dev] Lucene moving to Java7

[Sanne Grinovero]

On 31 March 2014 15:33, Steve Ebersole <steve at hibernate.org> wrote:
> http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/hibernate-dev/2013-February/009426.html

Thanks Steve. So I guess that settles it for OGM as well?

(Removed all people from CC as we're changing subject)
-- Sanne

>
>
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 5:16 AM, Gunnar Morling <gunnar at hibernate.org>
> wrote:
>>
>> 2014-03-31 12:08 GMT+02:00 Sanne Grinovero <sanne at hibernate.org>:
>>
>> > Since Hibernate OGM is now an implementation of JPA 2.1, doesn't it
>> > already require Java 7?
>> >
>>
>> Good point; Not sure whether JPA 2.1 per-se really requires Java 7, but I
>> understand as an implementation we'd be "allowed" to require Java 7 as per
>> the spec guidelines. So far, 6 seemed sufficient for our purposes.
>>
>> You could also decide to use Java7 for the build but not necessarily
>> > make use of Java7 features, as Search is an optional dependency. (but
>> > I also don't see a problem on moving).
>> >
>>
>> Yes, I thought about this as well, but it makes a difficult story to
>> explain (depending on whether you use JP-QL or not, and depending on the
>> backend you use, you may be use Java 6 or 7). I'd rather move to 7
>> altogether then and keep things a bit simpler.
>>
>> >
>> > I would like to encourage OGM to switch to Search 5 soon though: the
>> > HQL parser is aligning already, and some features we're working on in
>> > Search are meant to improve the user experience for OGM users
>> > specifically (HSEARCH-1119), not least it's the version meant for
>> > Infinispan 7, which OGM will need to support a GridDialect over
>> > HotRod. And solid performance improvements as usual ;-)
>> >
>>
>> +1 :-)
>>
>>
>> >
>> > -- Sanne
>> >
>> > On 31 March 2014 10:40, Gunnar Morling <gunnar at hibernate.org> wrote:
>> > > +1
>> > >
>> > > One potential issue coming to mind is that this will require Hibernate
>> > OGM
>> > > users to work with Java 7 as well (at least when using queries via
>> > Hibernate
>> > > Search).
>> > >
>> > > When discussing the issue (for OGM) last time, we decided to stick to
>> > Java 6
>> > > to ease OGM experiments of existing Hibernate ORM users. Personally I
>> > don't
>> > > think it's a problem, (I had wished to move OGM to Java 7 before),
>> > > just
>> > > pointing out the fact so that there are no surprises.
>> > >
>> > > So once we upgrade OGM to HSEARCH 5.x, I'd then make use of Java 7
>> > features
>> > > in OGM as well.
>> > >
>> > > --Gunnar
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > 2014-03-20 19:20 GMT+01:00 Hardy Ferentschik <hardy at hibernate.org>:
>> > >
>> > >> +100
>> > >>
>> > >> On 20 Jan 2014, at 16:21, Sanne Grinovero <sanne at hibernate.org>
>> > >> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> > The next minor release of Apache Lucene v. 4.8 will require Java7.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > The Lucene team has highlighted many good reasons for that,
>> > >> > including
>> > >> > some excellent improvements in sorting performance and reliability
>> > >> > of
>> > >> > IO operations: nice things we'd like to take advantage of.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Objections against baseling Hibernate Search 5 to *require* Java7
>> > >> > too?
>> > >> > We hardly have a choice, so objections better be good ;-)
>> > >> >
>> > >> > -- Sanne
>> > >> > _______________________________________________
>> > >> > hibernate-dev mailing list
>> > >> > hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> > >> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>> > >>
>> > >> _______________________________________________
>> > >> hibernate-dev mailing list
>> > >> hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> > >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> hibernate-dev mailing list
>> hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>
>