[hibernate-dev] Trying Hibernate 5.0.0.Beta1

Steve Ebersole steve at hibernate.org
Thu Apr 2 15:06:28 EDT 2015


I am working on it as we speak :)

On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 2:05 PM, Petar Tahchiev <paranoiabla at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Cool,
>
> ping me once resolved - I'm eager to test it :)
>
> 2015-04-02 21:57 GMT+03:00 Steve Ebersole <steve at hibernate.org>:
>
>> Petar, so I was unfortunately remembering the work done for 6.0 when
>> saying that wrt the FK name.  What I found is that binding support for JPA
>> @FK is, lets say "spotty" at best:
>> https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/HHH-9709
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 8:02 AM, Petar Tahchiev <paranoiabla at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> OK, maybe I'm doing something wrong. I also tried setting the foreign
>>> key name to "none" like this:
>>>
>>>     @ManyToMany(targetEntity = AbstractFilterModel.class, cascade = {
>>> CascadeType.PERSIST, CascadeType.MERGE, CascadeType.REFRESH }, fetch =
>>> FetchType.LAZY)
>>>     @JoinTable(inverseJoinColumns = {
>>>                     @JoinColumn(unique = false, nullable = true,
>>> insertable = true, updatable = true, foreignKey = @ForeignKey(name =
>>> "none", value = ConstraintMode.NO_CONSTRAINT), name = "filter_pk") },
>>> indexes = {
>>>                     @Index(unique = false, columnList = "entity_pk") },
>>> inverseForeignKey = @ForeignKey(name = "none", value =
>>> ConstraintMode.NO_CONSTRAINT), foreignKey = @ForeignKey(name = "none",
>>> value = ConstraintMode.NO_CONSTRAINT), joinColumns = {
>>>                     @JoinColumn(unique = false, nullable = true,
>>> insertable = true, updatable = true, foreignKey = @ForeignKey(name =
>>> "none", value = ConstraintMode.NO_CONSTRAINT), name = "entity_pk") }, name
>>> = "entity_filters")
>>>
>>>
>>> it didn't help - the foreign keys are still generated. I prepared a
>>> sample project with 2 tests:
>>> 1) will try to create an entity and fail because of the foreign key
>>> 2) will export the schema.sql so you can see the foregin keys are still
>>> generated.
>>>
>>> Sample project is here: https://github.com/paranoiabla/HHH-8805
>>>
>>>
>>> 2015-04-01 14:36 GMT+03:00 Steve Ebersole <steve at hibernate.org>:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/HHH-8805?focusedCommentId=66093&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-66093
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 6:20 AM, Steve Ebersole <steve at hibernate.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> And no, we generally do not reopen issues from Closed state.  And
>>>>> here, given the different branches, I'd be more inclined to create a
>>>>> different issue referencing the original.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 6:18 AM, Steve Ebersole <steve at hibernate.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hmm, it seems I inadvertently set the wrong fix version on HHH-8805.
>>>>>> It is fixed in our metamodel branch which is 6.0.  I pulled the necessary
>>>>>> metamodel (org.hibernate.mapping) changes back to master (5.0), but only
>>>>>> the hbm.xml form of naming the FK "none" (magic value) is supported to
>>>>>> truly disable generation.  For the time being you can use this as well from
>>>>>> annotations; just name the FK "none".
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you can write some tests for this, it will make it easier for me
>>>>>> to implement.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 5:40 AM, Petar Tahchiev <paranoiabla at gmail.com
>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Oh,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> and one last thing: I don't think this is fixed:
>>>>>>> https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/HHH-8805
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Here's my mapping:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     @ManyToMany(targetEntity = AbstractFilterModel.class, cascade = {
>>>>>>>         CascadeType.PERSIST,
>>>>>>>         CascadeType.MERGE,
>>>>>>>         CascadeType.REFRESH
>>>>>>>     }, fetch = FetchType.LAZY)
>>>>>>>     @JoinTable(indexes = {
>>>>>>>         @Index(unique = false, columnList = "entity_pk")
>>>>>>>     }, inverseForeignKey =
>>>>>>> @ForeignKey(ConstraintMode.NO_CONSTRAINT), inverseJoinColumns = {
>>>>>>>         @JoinColumn(unique = false, nullable = true, insertable =
>>>>>>> true, updatable = true, foreignKey =
>>>>>>> @ForeignKey(ConstraintMode.NO_CONSTRAINT), name = "filter_pk")
>>>>>>>     }, joinColumns = {
>>>>>>>         @JoinColumn(unique = false, nullable = true, insertable =
>>>>>>> true, updatable = true, foreignKey =
>>>>>>> @ForeignKey(ConstraintMode.NO_CONSTRAINT), name = "entity_pk")
>>>>>>>     }, foreignKey = @ForeignKey(ConstraintMode.NO_CONSTRAINT), name
>>>>>>> = "entity_filters")
>>>>>>>     private Collection<AbstractFilterModelDefinition> filters;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As you can see I have added ConstraintMode.NO_CONSTRAINT wherever it
>>>>>>> is possible to add it. However here's what the schema tool generates:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     create index IDX8b6xl4emqmow8hikaf4hgx9xn on entity_filters
>>>>>>> (entity_pk);
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     alter table entity_filters
>>>>>>>         add constraint FKra38l70n01disvkge7i9ff5ym
>>>>>>>         foreign key (filter_pk)
>>>>>>>         references abstract_filter (pk);
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     alter table entity_filters
>>>>>>>         add constraint FKderx50xtd0lkeeblrj3o0ipq9
>>>>>>>         foreign key (entity_pk)
>>>>>>>         references stock_level (pk);
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     alter table entity_filters
>>>>>>>         add constraint FK7ery3yx4pg32ogvv1wpr150oq
>>>>>>>         foreign key (entity_pk)
>>>>>>>         references content_slot (pk);
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     alter table entity_filters
>>>>>>>         add constraint FKse5m2mj7rrwj8ndimynfnr2px
>>>>>>>         foreign key (entity_pk)
>>>>>>>         references blog_entry (pk);
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     alter table entity_filters
>>>>>>>         add constraint FK9nubqtdhrmefjv2a5oab2fcr2
>>>>>>>         foreign key (entity_pk)
>>>>>>>         references price (pk);
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     alter table entity_filters
>>>>>>>         add constraint FKcsuwqm524wu4u41oatrcalxvh
>>>>>>>         foreign key (entity_pk)
>>>>>>>         references tax (pk);
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     alter table entity_filters
>>>>>>>         add constraint FKmd3mm5pw9naa05ype38m6x1eo
>>>>>>>         foreign key (entity_pk)
>>>>>>>         references abstract_template (pk);
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     alter table entity_filters
>>>>>>>         add constraint FKsx6vnh2tga70pkne44dnq8kp0
>>>>>>>         foreign key (entity_pk)
>>>>>>>         references discount (pk);
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     alter table entity_filters
>>>>>>>         add constraint FK6yx2wc1w1yb6qa1cx4byv7mju
>>>>>>>         foreign key (entity_pk)
>>>>>>>         references classification_feature (pk);
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     alter table entity_filters
>>>>>>>         add constraint FKpoh168do203hfqwb7so7c4c79
>>>>>>>         foreign key (entity_pk)
>>>>>>>         references cms_navigation_node (pk);
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     alter table entity_filters
>>>>>>>         add constraint FKi85fkvbm7otl679ijlr6oyoff
>>>>>>>         foreign key (entity_pk)
>>>>>>>         references product (pk);
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     alter table entity_filters
>>>>>>>         add constraint FKi8semxf3lq0n12lm05v7oydeq
>>>>>>>         foreign key (entity_pk)
>>>>>>>         references abstract_page (pk);
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     alter table entity_filters
>>>>>>>         add constraint FKsjqo9a6quh1cg4y0wyqo4tp8b
>>>>>>>         foreign key (entity_pk)
>>>>>>>         references promotion (pk);
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     alter table entity_filters
>>>>>>>         add constraint FKfw64whfl6vgbqehj20qmc39i3
>>>>>>>         foreign key (entity_pk)
>>>>>>>         references simple_cms_widget (pk);
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The foreign keys are all different (in Hibernate 4.3.x they were the
>>>>>>> same), but I just don't want them. Shall I reopen the issue?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2015-04-01 13:32 GMT+03:00 Petar Tahchiev <paranoiabla at gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> One other thing I noticed:
>>>>>>>> hibernate-core-5 depends on
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> <groupId>org.jboss.logging</groupId>
>>>>>>>> <artifactId>jboss-logging</artifactId>
>>>>>>>> <version>3.2.1.Final</version>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> and if you have hibernate-validator 5.1.3.Final (the last stable),
>>>>>>>> it will depend on
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> <groupId>org.jboss.logging</groupId>
>>>>>>>> <artifactId>jboss-logging</artifactId>
>>>>>>>> <version>3.1.4.GA</version>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So you will get an exception of method not found on some
>>>>>>>> jboss-logging API. I excluded the jboss-loggin from the hibernate-validator
>>>>>>>> dependency, but now I get a ton of these TRACE statements
>>>>>>>> (literally every millisecond):
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2015-04-01 13:28:02,090
>>>>>>>> org.hibernate.event.internal.DefaultPersistEventListener
>>>>>>>> [http-nio-8112-exec-9] TRACE: Ignoring persistent instance
>>>>>>>> 2015-04-01 13:28:02,090
>>>>>>>> org.hibernate.event.internal.DefaultPersistEventListener
>>>>>>>> [http-nio-8112-exec-9] TRACE: Ignoring persistent instance
>>>>>>>> 2015-04-01 13:28:02,090
>>>>>>>> org.hibernate.event.internal.DefaultPersistEventListener
>>>>>>>> [http-nio-8112-exec-9] TRACE: Ignoring persistent instance
>>>>>>>> 2015-04-01 13:28:02,090
>>>>>>>> org.hibernate.event.internal.DefaultPersistEventListener
>>>>>>>> [http-nio-8112-exec-9] TRACE: Ignoring persistent instance
>>>>>>>> 2015-04-01 13:28:02,090
>>>>>>>> org.hibernate.event.internal.DefaultPersistEventListener
>>>>>>>> [http-nio-8112-exec-9] TRACE: Ignoring persistent instance
>>>>>>>> 2015-04-01 13:28:02,090
>>>>>>>> org.hibernate.event.internal.DefaultPersistEventListener
>>>>>>>> [http-nio-8112-exec-9] TRACE: Ignoring persistent instance
>>>>>>>> 2015-04-01 13:28:02,090
>>>>>>>> org.hibernate.event.internal.DefaultPersistEventListener
>>>>>>>> [http-nio-8112-exec-9] TRACE: Ignoring persistent instance
>>>>>>>> 2015-04-01 13:28:02,090
>>>>>>>> org.hibernate.event.internal.DefaultPersistEventListener
>>>>>>>> [http-nio-8112-exec-9] TRACE: Ignoring persistent instance
>>>>>>>> 2015-04-01 13:28:02,090
>>>>>>>> org.hibernate.event.internal.DefaultPersistEventListener
>>>>>>>> [http-nio-8112-exec-9] TRACE: Ignoring persistent instance
>>>>>>>> 2015-04-01 13:28:02,090
>>>>>>>> org.hibernate.event.internal.DefaultPersistEventListener
>>>>>>>> [http-nio-8112-exec-9] TRACE: Ignoring persistent instance
>>>>>>>> 2015-04-01 13:28:02,090
>>>>>>>> org.hibernate.event.internal.DefaultPersistEventListener
>>>>>>>> [http-nio-8112-exec-9] TRACE: Ignoring persistent instance
>>>>>>>> 2015-04-01 13:28:02,090
>>>>>>>> org.hibernate.event.internal.DefaultPersistEventListener
>>>>>>>> [http-nio-8112-exec-9] TRACE: Ignoring persistent instance
>>>>>>>> 2015-04-01 13:28:02,090
>>>>>>>> org.hibernate.event.internal.DefaultPersistEventListener
>>>>>>>> [http-nio-8112-exec-9] TRACE: Ignoring persistent instance
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  But at least it works.. I guess the only real solution is to have
>>>>>>>> hibernate-validator use the same jboss-logging version.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2015-04-01 10:39 GMT+03:00 Gunnar Morling <gunnar at hibernate.org>:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2015-04-01 2:21 GMT+02:00 Steve Ebersole <steve at hibernate.org>:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> > Just to clarify...  I *think* that as long as we run the build
>>>>>>>>> with Java 8
>>>>>>>>> > and set the bootclasspath to 6 or 7 we should be fine.
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yes, setting the boot classpath to 6 (or 7) makes sure you only
>>>>>>>>> use classes
>>>>>>>>> present in that JDK (be it explicitly or implicitly as in the
>>>>>>>>> ConcurrentHashMap case), because it's that class library which
>>>>>>>>> will be used
>>>>>>>>> for compilation then. It is cumbersome to use though as you need
>>>>>>>>> to specify
>>>>>>>>> the location of a 6 or 7 JDK which makes the build less easily
>>>>>>>>> portable
>>>>>>>>> between machines.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Currently, AnimalSniffer is in place to prevent this very category
>>>>>>>>> of error
>>>>>>>>> and I'm wondering why it didn't detect the "usage" of KeySetView.
>>>>>>>>> It really
>>>>>>>>> should have detected it, assuming it analyses the byte code of
>>>>>>>>> classes. But
>>>>>>>>> this makes me wonder now whether it only analyses the source code
>>>>>>>>> actually.
>>>>>>>>> Then it wouldn't be usable to prevent this sort of issue.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Coding against the ConcurrentMap interface is the best way to
>>>>>>>>> avoid the
>>>>>>>>> issue. But of course there is no guarantee that it happens again,
>>>>>>>>> unless
>>>>>>>>> e.g. having a build on CI which uses 6 or 7 on its boot classpath.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> > On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 7:13 PM, Steve Ebersole <
>>>>>>>>> steve at hibernate.org>
>>>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > > Well the idea is to run the Gradle process with Java 8 (the
>>>>>>>>> build itself
>>>>>>>>> > > is a Java process too don't forget).  We pass in the older JDK
>>>>>>>>> > specifically
>>>>>>>>> > > to be able to set the bootclasspath for compilation and the
>>>>>>>>> executable
>>>>>>>>> > for
>>>>>>>>> > > running tests.  That's the theory.
>>>>>>>>> > >
>>>>>>>>> > > Interestingly I developed a simplified project to test these
>>>>>>>>> theories:
>>>>>>>>> > > https://github.com/sebersole/gradle-mixed-jdk  And of course
>>>>>>>>> this all
>>>>>>>>> > > works there.  As you'd expect right?
>>>>>>>>> > >
>>>>>>>>> > > I think the JAXB thing comes into play here as well.  Gradle
>>>>>>>>> does not
>>>>>>>>> > have
>>>>>>>>> > > any XJC support built in, so we have to make use of its Ant
>>>>>>>>> support to
>>>>>>>>> > run
>>>>>>>>> > > the XJC Ant tasks for JAXB model generation.  The problem
>>>>>>>>> there is that,
>>>>>>>>> > > afaik, there is no way to tell Gradle's AntBuilder to use a
>>>>>>>>> JDK other
>>>>>>>>> > than
>>>>>>>>> > > the one that launched Gradle.  I think this is why we see a
>>>>>>>>> JAXB model
>>>>>>>>> > > defined for Java 7, rather than Java 6, because we essentially
>>>>>>>>> run XJC
>>>>>>>>> > with
>>>>>>>>> > > Java 8.
>>>>>>>>> > >
>>>>>>>>> > > Anyway, this certainly makes the build more complex and we
>>>>>>>>> definitely
>>>>>>>>> > have
>>>>>>>>> > > to think through all these scenarios.  In fact after Beta1,
>>>>>>>>> one of my
>>>>>>>>> > todos
>>>>>>>>> > > is to build up the build "from scratch" using that
>>>>>>>>> gradle-mixed-jdk
>>>>>>>>> > project
>>>>>>>>> > > as a basis.
>>>>>>>>> > >
>>>>>>>>> > > In general the plan though is to run all the tests (other than
>>>>>>>>> > > hibernate-java8, obviously) with the "baseline JDK, whether
>>>>>>>>> that be Java
>>>>>>>>> > 6
>>>>>>>>> > > or 7.
>>>>>>>>> > >
>>>>>>>>> > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 6:59 PM, Sanne Grinovero <
>>>>>>>>> sanne at hibernate.org>
>>>>>>>>> > > wrote:
>>>>>>>>> > >
>>>>>>>>> > >> There are many similar issues discussed on the Lucene
>>>>>>>>> developer's
>>>>>>>>> > >> mailing list, it's an interesting read:
>>>>>>>>> > >>  -
>>>>>>>>> > >>
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-dev/201503.mbox/%3C07c401d06aba%240b477c80%2421d67580%24%40thetaphi.de%3E
>>>>>>>>> > >>
>>>>>>>>> > >> I see no alternative than to have those test jobs actually
>>>>>>>>> exercising
>>>>>>>>> > >> ORM with JDK6, or maybe even compile it all with JDK6 except
>>>>>>>>> the Java8
>>>>>>>>> > >> additional module to be compiled with JDK8 ?
>>>>>>>>> > >>
>>>>>>>>> > >>
>>>>>>>>> > >>
>>>>>>>>> > >> On 1 April 2015 at 00:36, Steve Ebersole <steve at hibernate.org>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> > >> > Ahh, seems this may be an option to work around it:
>>>>>>>>> > >> >
>>>>>>>>> > >> > <quote>
>>>>>>>>> > >> > Using the general *Map* interface in place of the concrete
>>>>>>>>> > >> > *ConcurrentHashMap* type here side-steps the coupling to
>>>>>>>>> the Java 8
>>>>>>>>> > >> return
>>>>>>>>> > >> > type and will allow this code to be compiled with Java 8
>>>>>>>>> and run on
>>>>>>>>> > >> Java 7.
>>>>>>>>> > >> > </quote>
>>>>>>>>> > >> >
>>>>>>>>> > >> > I had missed that part.
>>>>>>>>> > >> >
>>>>>>>>> > >> >
>>>>>>>>> > >> > On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 6:34 PM, Steve Ebersole <
>>>>>>>>> steve at hibernate.org>
>>>>>>>>> > >> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> > >> >
>>>>>>>>> > >> >> When I say "internal" here, I mean internal to java
>>>>>>>>> classes.
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>
>>>>>>>>> > >> >> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 6:30 PM, Steve Ebersole <
>>>>>>>>> steve at hibernate.org
>>>>>>>>> > >
>>>>>>>>> > >> >> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>> Nope.  It just effects any code compiled with Java 8 even
>>>>>>>>> though the
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>> change is internal.  The problem is the generated bytecode
>>>>>>>>> > >> incorporates
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>> this change.   Like I said, this should be compiled with
>>>>>>>>> 1.6
>>>>>>>>> > >> compatibility,
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>> but that is apparently not working atm.  I am having a
>>>>>>>>> struggle
>>>>>>>>> > >> getting a
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>> mixed JDK build working "just right".
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 6:28 PM, Petar Tahchiev <
>>>>>>>>> > >> paranoiabla at gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>> According to this:
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>> https://gist.github.com/AlainODea/1375759b8720a3f9f094
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>> Notably the Java 1.7 *ConcurrentHashMap#keySet()*
>>>>>>>>> returns a Set<K>
>>>>>>>>> > >> while
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>> the 1.8*ConcurrentHashMap#keySet()* returns a
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>> ConcurrentHashMap.KeySetView<K,V>`.
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>> I think you're using some Java8 API.
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>> 2015-04-01 2:25 GMT+03:00 Petar Tahchiev <
>>>>>>>>> paranoiabla at gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>> petar at petar-ThinkPad-X1-Carbon:~$ java -version
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>> java version "1.7.0_71"
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>> Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.7.0_71-b14)
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>> Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 24.71-b01,
>>>>>>>>> mixed mode)
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>> petar at petar-ThinkPad-X1-Carbon:~$ uname -a
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>> Linux petar-ThinkPad-X1-Carbon 3.16.0-33-generic
>>>>>>>>> #44-Ubuntu SMP
>>>>>>>>> > Thu
>>>>>>>>> > >> Mar
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>> 12 12:19:35 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>> petar at petar-ThinkPad-X1-Carbon:~$
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>> 2015-04-01 2:21 GMT+03:00 Steve Ebersole <
>>>>>>>>> steve at hibernate.org>:
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>> What JRE are you trying to use?  This error:
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>> java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: java.util.concurrent.
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>> ConcurrentHashMap.keySet()Ljava/util/concurrent/
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>> ConcurrentHashMap$KeySetView;
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>> is indicative of an issue in cross-jre support due to
>>>>>>>>> a change
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>> internal to java classes.
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 6:03 PM, Petar Tahchiev <
>>>>>>>>> > >> paranoiabla at gmail.com
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> Thanks Steve,
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> I managed to migrate my configuration to the new
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> MetamodelImplementor. Now when I run the scema export
>>>>>>>>> I get a
>>>>>>>>> > lot
>>>>>>>>> > >> of these
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> warning:
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> INFO : HHH000400: Using dialect:
>>>>>>>>> > >> org.hibernate.dialect.MySQL5Dialect
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> WARN : JDBC Driver reports it stores quoted
>>>>>>>>> identifiers in both
>>>>>>>>> > >> mixed
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> and upper case
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> WARN : HHH000072: Duplicate joins for class:
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> com.xxx.platform.core.model.cms.AbstractPageModel
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> WARN : HHH000072: Duplicate joins for class:
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> com.xxx.platform.module.invoice.core.model.InvoicePageModel
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> WARN : HHH000072: Duplicate joins for class:
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> com.xxx.platform.core.model.batch.BatchStepExecutionContextModel
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> WARN : HHH000072: Duplicate joins for class:
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> com.xxx.platform.core.model.batch.BatchJobExecutionContextModel
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> WARN : HHH000072: Duplicate joins for class:
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> > >>
>>>>>>>>> com.xxx.platform.module.search.core.model.SearchKeywordRedirectModel
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> WARN : HHH000072: Duplicate joins for class:
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> > com.xxx.platform.module.search.core.model.SearchPageRedirectModel
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> WARN : HHH000072: Duplicate joins for class:
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> com.xxx.platform.module.promotion.core.model.PromotionModel
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> and when I run some test I get the following
>>>>>>>>> exception:
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> > >>
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap.keySet()Ljava/util/concurrent/ConcurrentHashMap$KeySetView;
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>     at
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> > >>
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> org.hibernate.internal.SessionFactoryImpl.iterateEntityNameResolvers(SessionFactoryImpl.java:733)
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>     at
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> > >>
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> org.hibernate.internal.SessionImpl$CoordinatingEntityNameResolver.resolveEntityName(SessionImpl.java:2470)
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>     at
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> > >>
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> org.hibernate.internal.SessionImpl.guessEntityName(SessionImpl.java:1992)
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>     at
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> > >>
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> org.hibernate.internal.SessionImpl.getEntityPersister(SessionImpl.java:1485)
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>     at
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> > >>
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> org.hibernate.event.internal.DefaultMergeEventListener.onMerge(DefaultMergeEventListener.java:163)
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>     at
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> > >>
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> org.hibernate.event.internal.DefaultMergeEventListener.onMerge(DefaultMergeEventListener.java:85)
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>     at
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> org.hibernate.internal.SessionImpl.fireMerge(SessionImpl.java:882)
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>     at
>>>>>>>>> > >> org.hibernate.internal.SessionImpl.merge(SessionImpl.java:864)
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>     at
>>>>>>>>> > >> org.hibernate.internal.SessionImpl.merge(SessionImpl.java:869)
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>     at
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> > >>
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> org.hibernate.jpa.spi.AbstractEntityManagerImpl.merge(AbstractEntityManagerImpl.java:1196)
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>     at
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> > >>
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> org.springframework.batch.item.database.JpaItemWriter.doWrite(JpaItemWriter.java:104)
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>     at
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> > >>
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> org.springframework.batch.item.database.JpaItemWriter.write(JpaItemWriter.java:83)
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> 2015-04-01 1:23 GMT+03:00 Steve Ebersole <
>>>>>>>>> steve at hibernate.org>:
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> I am told that the bug does not affect the
>>>>>>>>> JBoss->Central sync
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> process.  So at some point the artifacts should all
>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>> > available
>>>>>>>>> > >> in Central
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 5:19 PM, Steve Ebersole <
>>>>>>>>> > >> steve at hibernate.org
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> hibernate-core seems to be the only artifact that
>>>>>>>>> is available
>>>>>>>>> > >> in
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> JBoss Nexus.
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Steve Ebersole <
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> steve at hibernate.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> So apparently the artifacts / repo issue is a
>>>>>>>>> Nexus bug that
>>>>>>>>> > is
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> effecting the JBoss repo (and therefore us)...
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> http://issues.sonatype.org/browse/NEXUS-7654
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> As I pointed out in the announcement, I am
>>>>>>>>> managing the
>>>>>>>>> > >> "migration
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> guide" in source repo while I develop the Betas.
>>>>>>>>> See
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> > >>
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/hibernate/hibernate-orm/blob/master/working-5.0-migration-guide.md
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>  As far are the new bootstrapping apis, see
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> > >>
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> http://docs.jboss.org/hibernate/orm/5.0/topical/html/bootstrap/NativeBootstrapping.html
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> > >>
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> http://docs.jboss.org/hibernate/orm/5.0/topical/html/bootstrap/LegacyBootstrapping.html
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Petar Tahchiev <
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> paranoiabla at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi guys,
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> I just tried the latest beta and I cannot compile
>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>> > project.
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> With the
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> latest hibernate 4.3.X I was able to do this:
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> -------
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>         final org.hibernate.cfg.Configuration
>>>>>>>>> configuration
>>>>>>>>> > =
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> getHibernateConfiguration();
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>         configuration.buildMappings();
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>         final SchemaUpdate schemaUpdate = new
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> SchemaUpdate(configuration);
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> -------
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> however it seems that the SchemaUpdate
>>>>>>>>> constructor has been
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> removed and now
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> a new one is added:
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> --------
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>     public SchemaUpdate(MetadataImplementor
>>>>>>>>> metadata) {
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>         this(
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> metadata.getMetadataBuildingOptions().getServiceRegistry(),
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> metadata );
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>     }
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> ---------
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Also the configuration.buildMappings() method has
>>>>>>>>> been
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> deprecated. Where do
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> I get the MetadataImplementor from? Also is there
>>>>>>>>> any
>>>>>>>>> > >> changelog I
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> can refer
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> to?
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Regards, Petar!
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Karlovo, Bulgaria.
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Public PGP Key at:
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> > >>
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> https://keyserver1.pgp.com/vkd/DownloadKey.event?keyid=0x19658550C3110611
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> Key Fingerprint: A369 A7EE 61BC 93A3 CDFF  55A5
>>>>>>>>> 1965 8550
>>>>>>>>> > C311
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> 0611
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> hibernate-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>> hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> Regards, Petar!
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> Karlovo, Bulgaria.
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> Public PGP Key at:
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> > >>
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> https://keyserver1.pgp.com/vkd/DownloadKey.event?keyid=0x19658550C3110611
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> Key Fingerprint: A369 A7EE 61BC 93A3 CDFF  55A5 1965
>>>>>>>>> 8550 C311
>>>>>>>>> > >> 0611
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>> Regards, Petar!
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>> Karlovo, Bulgaria.
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>> Public PGP Key at:
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>> > >>
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> https://keyserver1.pgp.com/vkd/DownloadKey.event?keyid=0x19658550C3110611
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>> Key Fingerprint: A369 A7EE 61BC 93A3 CDFF  55A5 1965
>>>>>>>>> 8550 C311
>>>>>>>>> > 0611
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>> --
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>> Regards, Petar!
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>> Karlovo, Bulgaria.
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>> ---
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>> Public PGP Key at:
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>
>>>>>>>>> > >>
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> https://keyserver1.pgp.com/vkd/DownloadKey.event?keyid=0x19658550C3110611
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>> Key Fingerprint: A369 A7EE 61BC 93A3 CDFF  55A5 1965
>>>>>>>>> 8550 C311 0611
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>>
>>>>>>>>> > >> >>
>>>>>>>>> > >> > _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> > >> > hibernate-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>>> > >> > hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>>>>>> > >> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>>>>>>>>> > >>
>>>>>>>>> > >
>>>>>>>>> > >
>>>>>>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> > hibernate-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>>> > hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>>>>>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> hibernate-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>>> hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Regards, Petar!
>>>>>>>> Karlovo, Bulgaria.
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>> Public PGP Key at:
>>>>>>>> https://keyserver1.pgp.com/vkd/DownloadKey.event?keyid=0x19658550C3110611
>>>>>>>> Key Fingerprint: A369 A7EE 61BC 93A3 CDFF  55A5 1965 8550 C311 0611
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Regards, Petar!
>>>>>>> Karlovo, Bulgaria.
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> Public PGP Key at:
>>>>>>> https://keyserver1.pgp.com/vkd/DownloadKey.event?keyid=0x19658550C3110611
>>>>>>> Key Fingerprint: A369 A7EE 61BC 93A3 CDFF  55A5 1965 8550 C311 0611
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Regards, Petar!
>>> Karlovo, Bulgaria.
>>> ---
>>> Public PGP Key at:
>>> https://keyserver1.pgp.com/vkd/DownloadKey.event?keyid=0x19658550C3110611
>>> Key Fingerprint: A369 A7EE 61BC 93A3 CDFF  55A5 1965 8550 C311 0611
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Regards, Petar!
> Karlovo, Bulgaria.
> ---
> Public PGP Key at:
> https://keyserver1.pgp.com/vkd/DownloadKey.event?keyid=0x19658550C3110611
> Key Fingerprint: A369 A7EE 61BC 93A3 CDFF  55A5 1965 8550 C311 0611
>


More information about the hibernate-dev mailing list