[hibernate-dev] Today's release

Steve Ebersole steve at hibernate.org
Wed Apr 29 13:02:20 EDT 2015


WRT performance testing... well I think we can agree that the performance
would not be worse.  So I don't see the harm in that regard.

On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Sanne Grinovero <sanne at hibernate.org>
wrote:

> On 29 April 2015 at 16:54, Steve Ebersole <steve at hibernate.org> wrote:
> > For EntityKey vs CacheKey, that reminds me... have we ever unified the
> > differing notions of a "cache key"?  Aka, just have the RegionFactory
> build
> > CachKeys for us so that we don't have to always be re-wrapping...
>
> Right that's what I'm referring to. I don't know if someone will have
> time to properly implement it all (as changes would need to be
> performance tested and that's going to take time), so I would aim to
> at very least check that this won't need API changes later.
>
>
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Sanne Grinovero <sanne at hibernate.org>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> I would love that as I should really check on two last things but
> >> couldn't make time yet.
> >>  - the Locking API
> >>  - checking if what I'm having in mind regarding EntityKey vs CacheKey
> >> needs any API change
> >>
> >> +1 for a little extra time
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >> Sanne
> >>
> >> On 29 April 2015 at 16:22, Steve Ebersole <steve at hibernate.org> wrote:
> >> > Oh... and I'd *like* to get the Karaf features file figured out.  Not
> >> > blocker, but a nice to have.
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 10:20 AM, Steve Ebersole <steve at hibernate.org
> >
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> I had originally planned on today's release being the first CR for
> 5.0.
> >> >> I
> >> >> am re-thinking that now.  Here is why...
> >> >>
> >> >> 1) If we were to ever start offering a typed API, a major major
> release
> >> >> would be the time to do that.  However, we'd still have the "load() +
> >> >> proxy
> >> >> interfaces" issue to decide a course of action on.
> >> >> 2) I have just introduced that Transaction changes after the first
> >> >> Beta.
> >> >> It is probably prudent to have one more Beta to allow people time to
> >> >> try
> >> >> out those changes and ask for changes.
> >> >> 3) I would still like to complete deprecating the Settings contract.
> >> >> The
> >> >> last piece there is the discussion I started earlier on the dev list
> >> >> wrt
> >> >> its usage in SPI contracts (L2 cache, etc).  I would likely not get
> >> >> that
> >> >> done today.
> >> >>
> >> >> So I wanted to suggest that today's release instead be Beta2, with
> CR1
> >> >> slated for 4 weeks from today.  Thoughts?
> >> >>
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > hibernate-dev mailing list
> >> > hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
> >
> >
>


More information about the hibernate-dev mailing list