[hibernate-dev] Problems upgrading ORM 4.3 branch to use Infinispan 7.2.1.Final
Gail Badner
gbadner at redhat.com
Mon May 11 16:23:04 EDT 2015
Just to let you know, I'm working on the pull request.
My plan is to:
- merge pull request (still need to review)
- re-build/test hibernate-infinispan using Infinispan 6.0.0.Final
- manually test hibernate-infinispan using Infinispan 7.2.1.Final [1]
- push commit and snapshot
- run standalone TCK using Hibernate 4.3 snapshot with Infinispan 6.0.0.Final
- run standalone TCK using Hibernate 4.3 snapshot with Infinispan 7.2.1.Final
If all goes well, release 4.3.10.Final. If not, I'll keep you posted.
[1] I'd like to change the gradle build so that hibernate-infinispan unit tests are executed twice; first time using Infinispan 6.0.0.Final; second time using 7.2.1.Final. I haven't done much with gradle, so if someone can tell me quickly how to do this, I'll get the gradle build change into 4.3.10.Final; otherwise, I'll get that build change into 4.3.11.Final.
Thanks,
Gail
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Steve Ebersole" <steve at hibernate.org>
> To: "Sanne Grinovero" <sanne at hibernate.org>
> Cc: "Galder Zamarreño" <galder at redhat.com>, "Scott Marlow" <smarlow at redhat.com>, "Gail Badner" <gbadner at redhat.com>,
> "Hibernate Dev" <hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> Sent: Monday, May 11, 2015 9:14:37 AM
> Subject: Re: Problems upgrading ORM 4.3 branch to use Infinispan 7.2.1.Final
>
> WRT 4.4, nooooooooooooooooo! :)
>
> On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Sanne Grinovero <sanne at hibernate.org>
> wrote:
>
> > On 11 May 2015 at 16:35, Galder Zamarreño <galder at redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> On 11 May 2015, at 17:26, Sanne Grinovero <sanne at hibernate.org> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Any reason to not upgrade Hibernate ORM 4.3 to use Infinispan
> > 7.2.1.Final ?
> > >> Was Infinispan 6 friendly to JDK 6 users?
> > >
> > > Yup, Infinispan 6 requires JDK 6, and Infinispan 7 requires JDK7.
> > >
> > > Also, on top of JDK changes, not sure it'd be a good idea to make a
> > dependency update of that magnitude in a bug fix release, since it'd change
> > the Infinispan version used, and you'd break all the standalone 4.3 users
> > that have tweaked Infinispan configuration, they'd have to move to the more
> > WF/AS-like XML configuration. Those using default would be fine since we
> > could tweak the default configuration.
> >
> > Ok, many good reasons :)
> >
> > But it's a worrying divergence between the catefory of users running
> > in WildFly and who doesn't. Also we'd want CI tests for both
> > Infinispan integrations, which is not trivial because of all the
> > changes in the Infinispan configuration format.
> >
> > Should this be a 4.4.0 release?
> >
> > Regarding the JDK, one could say that Java 7 is required when using
> > the Infinispan cache. This is something we'd need to document for
> > Hibernate ORM 5 anyway, might as well have it apply to a 4.4.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Sanne
> >
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > >>
> > >> On 11 May 2015 at 16:23, Galder Zamarreño <galder at redhat.com> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> On 11 May 2015, at 16:45, Scott Marlow <smarlow at redhat.com> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Do we need to have a Hibernate ORM continuous integration test setup
> > to run against Infinispan 7.2.1? How about Infinispan 8.x (master?). Or
> > is ORM/Infinispan already tested as part of the Infinispan CI testing?
> > >>>
> > >>> In this particular case, as mentioned below, running ORM 4.3 testsuite
> > with Infinispan 7.2.1 would mostly fail because of XML changes. Again, this
> > does not affect WF, so it would not really help you much.
> > >>>
> > >>> We do have some tests in Infinispan CI to test integration with HB but
> > need some updates [1].
> > >>>
> > >>> Cheers,
> > >>>
> > >>> [1]
> > http://ci.infinispan.org/project.html?projectId=HibernateIntegration
> > >>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On 05/11/2015 04:31 AM, Galder Zamarreño wrote:
> > >>>>> Hi Gail,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> I've sent a PR for 4.3 to fix HHH-9781 and HHH-9776 in a way that it
> > works fine with both Infinispan 7.x and 6.x:
> > >>>>> https://github.com/hibernate/hibernate-orm/pull/948
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Cheers,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> On 11 May 2015, at 09:48, Galder Zamarreño <galder at redhat.com>
> > wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Hi Gail,
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Thanks for looking into this.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> For the scope of WF, the XML part is irrelevant since WF does its
> > own configuration parsing, and hence there's no need to make any such
> > changes in ORM 4.3. If someone wants to use ORM 4.3 with Infinispan 7.2.x
> > standalone, then yes, they need to adjust XML configuration.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> The evict/clear issues that 7.2 brought up, and the incorrect
> > element count can be fixed in ORM 4.3 without the need to up the dependency
> > to 7.2. We just need to apply the changes in a way that work regardless of
> > whether 6.0 or 7.2 is used.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> I'll work on that today.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Cheers,
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> On 11 May 2015, at 07:49, Gail Badner <gbadner at redhat.com> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> I ran into some issues upgrading to Infinispan 7.2.1.Final in 4.3
> > branch.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> I cherry-picked the 2 commits for HHH-9632 to upgrade 4.3 to use
> > Infinispan 7.1.0.Final:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> 1)
> > https://github.com/hibernate/hibernate-orm/commit/260ff03ae5e8cce0d1d56484e32825222e3046d5
> > >>>>>>> 2)
> > https://github.com/hibernate/hibernate-orm/commit/1b7e112994413559484e6873f019c5e2c557506b
> > >>>>>>> (The 3rd (merge) commit (2cff88cac76147ebb0da5bff8d3605c8a109fd26)
> > appeared duplicate 1b7e112994413559484e6873f019c5e2c557506b).
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> 1) updated infinispan-configs.xml to use
> > >>>>>>> <infinispan xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
> > >>>>>>> xmlns="urn:infinispan:config:7.0"
> > >>>>>>> xsi:schemaLocation="urn:infinispan:config:7.0
> > http://www.infinispan.org/schemas/infinispan-config-7.0.xsd">
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> After 1) was cherry-picked, I was able to build and run tests
> > successfully using Infinispan 7.1.0.Final. When I tried running tests
> > (without cleaning) using Infinispan 6.0.0.Final, there were lots of test
> > failures due to problems configuring the cache:
> > >>>>>>> Caused by: org.hibernate.cache.CacheException
> > >>>>>>> Caused by:
> > org.infinispan.commons.CacheConfigurationException
> > >>>>>>> Caused by: javax.xml.stream.XMLStreamException
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> I've attached the output from test
> > org.hibernate.test.cache.infinispan.InfinispanRegionFactoryTestCase.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Do we need to continue to support running Infinispan 6.0.0.Final
> > in ORM 4.3 branch? Could an application have its own dependence on
> > Infinispan 6.0.0.Final?
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Next I cherry-picked the commit for HHH-9781 to upgrade Infinispan
> > to 7.2.1.Final:
> > https://github.com/hibernate/hibernate-orm/commit/37494f4a9f31c7eaa3486542cb2014b1d3756a87.
> > After rebuilding,
> > >>>>>>>
> > org.hibernate.test.cache.infinispan.timestamp.TimestampsRegionImplTestCase
> > fails. I've attached the output for that test as well.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Galder, HHH-9781 is still open. Is there more work to do on this?
> > Am I missing some other commit that would fix the
> > TimestampsRegionImplTestCase failure?
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> This commit (for HHH-9781) includes a change to use
> > org.infinispan.commons.util.CloseableIterator, which does not appear to be
> > in Infinispan 6.0.0.Final, so this would not be backward-compatible either.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Next I cherry-picked the commit for HHH-9776:
> > https://github.com/hibernate/hibernate-orm/commit/f8186e10c24a4951785ab43dbaadbec3195df2e5.
> > TimestampsRegionImplTestCase still fails; there are no other failures.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Galder, HHH-9776 is still open. Is there more work to be done on
> > that issue?
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> I've pushed this work to my fork for others to see:
> > https://github.com/gbadner/hibernate-core/tree/HHH-9632_HHH-9781_HHH-9776.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> I've postponed creating a pull request and running the TCK until
> > we resolve backward-compatibility requirements and the unit test failure.
> > It's OK with me if someone wants to go ahead and run the TCK with what I
> > have so far.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Regards,
> > >>>>>>> Gail
> > >>>>>>>
> > <TEST-org.hibernate.test.cache.infinispan.timestamp.TimestampsRegionImplTestCase.xml><TEST-org.hibernate.test.cache.infinispan.InfinispanRegionFactoryTestCase.xml>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> --
> > >>>>>> Galder Zamarreño
> > >>>>>> galder at redhat.com
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> --
> > >>>>> Galder Zamarreño
> > >>>>> galder at redhat.com
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>> Galder Zamarreño
> > >>> galder at redhat.com
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Galder Zamarreño
> > > galder at redhat.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
More information about the hibernate-dev
mailing list