emmanuel at hibernate.org
Fri Aug 26 02:59:38 EDT 2016
Because we likely have more breaking changed planned in 6.0, I don't think your renaming plan would add a lot. Better focus on 6.
> On 18 août 2016, at 14:42, Scott Marlow <smarlow at redhat.com> wrote:
>> On 08/17/2016 03:54 PM, Steve Ebersole wrote:
>> For whatever reason discussion about JavaMoney/Moneta support has heated up
>> again the past few days. Is this important enough to warrant a 5.3 release?
> My (late) vote is to rename 5.2 -> 6.0 and have the 5.3 release be based
> on the current ORM 5.1 branch. 5.3 would include changes that are
> compatible with ORM 5.0.x applications (so that 5.0 users can migrate to
> 5.3, without having to rewrite code). 5.2 users would then migrate to
> 6.0, which would continue to have the same changes (plus whatever else
> is included). I'm thinking that this would open up a path for new ORM
> features to be made available to ORM 5.0.x applications, via the 5.3+
>> If we are going to cut a 5.3 I'd also suggest we include the recent work I
>> did in regards to CDI support as well.
>> hibernate-dev mailing list
>> hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
> hibernate-dev mailing list
> hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
More information about the hibernate-dev