[hibernate-dev] OpenJDK proposal: JDK 9 modules and reflection

Emmanuel Bernard emmanuel at hibernate.org
Fri Sep 16 13:27:21 EDT 2016


No one ?

> On 13 Sep 2016, at 10:19, Emmanuel Bernard <emmanuel at hibernate.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Sanne kindly pointed out to me the latest proposal by the OpenJDK team
> around JDK 9 module and how they would handle frameworks needing access
> to non exported types (Hibernate, dependency injection, etc).
> 
> If you are remotely into JDK9, please read it and provide feedback.
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jpms-spec-experts/2016-September/000390.html
> 
> It's better than before for sure. It feels to me that most applications
> (the core of it) will end up being a weak module for this to work
> though. I'm not sure whether it is good or bad, at least a isolation
> concious person has the choice.
> 
>    export private some.package;
> 
> Is essentially equivalent to what you can do for a given package in Java
> 8.
> What I am less clear about is what relation Hibernate * projects really
> need with a module containing the entities. Do we still this proposal
> still mandates to use
> 
>    requires hibernate.entitymanager;
>    requires hibernate.core;
> 
> in the targeted module?
> 
> Or would this be a usable module
> 
>    module foo.bar {
>        exports private com.foo.bar.model;
>        requires javax.jpa;
>        // requires hibernate.entitymanager/core; no longer needed thanks to export private?
>    }
> 
> Mark proposes that in a container (EE or anything controlling module loading
> really), the container adds dynamically the addExports to the relevant
> framework. But that looks like a solution to limit exports private
> implications.
> 
> Comments?
> 
> Emmanuel
> _______________________________________________
> hibernate-dev mailing list
> hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev


More information about the hibernate-dev mailing list