[hibernate-dev] HHH-9329
Christian Beikov
christian.beikov at gmail.com
Fri Sep 23 13:31:52 EDT 2016
Is the fix I proposed in my
PR(https://github.com/hibernate/hibernate-orm/pull/1561) non-compatible?
Did I miss discussion about that somewhere or didn't you have time to
review that yet?
Am 23.09.2016 um 18:50 schrieb Steve Ebersole:
> Depends on the "fix" we all agree on. Mainly whether that leads to
> any non-compatible SPI changes.
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 11:41 AM Christian Beikov
> <christian.beikov at gmail.com <mailto:christian.beikov at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Ahh okay, I see. Sorry, I didn't fully read my previous mail and
> forgot I asked that question ^^
> Well then I'll try upgrading to 5.2 and hope for the best :)
>
> So are you considering merging that to 5.2 then?
>
>
>
> Am 23.09.2016 um 18:36 schrieb Steve Ebersole:
>> Nope. You asked:
>>
>> Are the problems with Hibernate 5.1+ and Infinispan fixed yet? I
>> didn't
>> consider upgrading yet because I read of some issues.
>>
>> Now its possibly I misread your reference to HIbernate+Infinispan
>> problems to mean the only ones I know of. hence the HHH-10707
>> reference. If you meant some other "Hibernate 5.1+ and
>> Infinispan" problem, then I guess you could have been more
>> specific ;)
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 11:33 AM Christian Beikov
>> <christian.beikov at gmail.com <mailto:christian.beikov at gmail.com>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Wrong thread?
>>
>>
>> Am 23.09.2016 um 17:53 schrieb Steve Ebersole:
>>> There are some conceptual mismatch problem that IMO stem
>>> from the L2C SPI. We are discussing that all as part of
>>> https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/HHH-10707
>>>
>>> Whether that affects you really depends how you configure
>>> caching. If you try to reuse regions for different types of
>>> data (entity, collection, etc) then it will affect you. If
>>> you define different access strategies for the same region
>>> then it will affect you.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 1:02 AM Christian Beikov
>>> <christian.beikov at gmail.com
>>> <mailto:christian.beikov at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Well to be fair, I already reported that this
>>> "regression" was
>>> introduced in 4.2.8 by placing the ON predicate on the
>>> target table join
>>> instead of the collection table join as was done before
>>> in 4.2.7.SP1.
>>> I am not using 4.x anymore but since Wildfly ships with
>>> Hibernate 5.0, I
>>> suppose that others could benefit from this too.
>>> Are the problems with Hibernate 5.1+ and Infinispan
>>> fixed yet? I didn't
>>> consider upgrading yet because I read of some issues.
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Christian
>>>
>>> Am 22.09.2016 um 22:10 schrieb Gail Badner:
>>> > Hi Christian,
>>> >
>>> > We are only backporting critical issues and
>>> regressions to 5.0 at this
>>> > point, so it can't be backported to 5.0. If no
>>> regressions caused by
>>> > this fix are reported in 5.2, I would consider
>>> backporting to 5.1.
>>> >
>>> > Regards,
>>> > Gail
>>> >
>>> > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 12:14 AM, Christian Beikov
>>> > <christian.beikov at gmail.com
>>> <mailto:christian.beikov at gmail.com>
>>> <mailto:christian.beikov at gmail.com
>>> <mailto:christian.beikov at gmail.com>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Thanks, I know that it's a beauty ^^
>>> > Hope this can get into all 5.x branches?
>>> >
>>> > Regards,
>>> > Christian
>>> > Am 20.09.2016 um 23:05 schrieb Steve Ebersole:
>>> > > I took a quick look. I'd prefer to see better
>>> solution as we
>>> > migrate
>>> > > to SQM; but for 5.x, given how Hibernate
>>> generates SQL there, I
>>> > am not
>>> > > sure how else you would possibly do this
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 12:54 PM Vlad Mihalcea
>>> > > <mihalcea.vlad at gmail.com
>>> <mailto:mihalcea.vlad at gmail.com>
>>> <mailto:mihalcea.vlad at gmail.com
>>> <mailto:mihalcea.vlad at gmail.com>>
>>> > <mailto:mihalcea.vlad at gmail.com
>>> <mailto:mihalcea.vlad at gmail.com>
>>> <mailto:mihalcea.vlad at gmail.com
>>> <mailto:mihalcea.vlad at gmail.com>>>>
>>> > wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > Thanks,
>>> > >
>>> > > I'm going to review it tomorrow.
>>> > >
>>> > > Vlad
>>> > >
>>> > > On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 8:38 PM, Christian
>>> Beikov <
>>> > >christian.beikov at gmail.com
>>> <mailto:christian.beikov at gmail.com>
>>> <mailto:christian.beikov at gmail.com
>>> <mailto:christian.beikov at gmail.com>>
>>> > <mailto:christian.beikov at gmail.com
>>> <mailto:christian.beikov at gmail.com>
>>> > <mailto:christian.beikov at gmail.com
>>> <mailto:christian.beikov at gmail.com>>>> wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > > Hey again,
>>> > > >
>>> > > > I implemented the approach that I proposed
>>> in the issue and a
>>> > > test in
>>> > > >
>>> https://github.com/hibernate/hibernate-orm/pull/1561
>>> > <https://github.com/hibernate/hibernate-orm/pull/1561>
>>> > > >
>>> > > > It detects left joins with join tables
>>> that use the target
>>> > table
>>> > > alias.
>>> > > > The join table is replaced with a subquery
>>> and the WITH clause
>>> > > is moved
>>> > > > to the join of the subquery.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Any comments?
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Regards,
>>> > > > Christian
>>> > > >
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> > > > hibernate-dev mailing list
>>> > > > hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> <mailto:hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>>> > <mailto:hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> <mailto:hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org>>
>>> > <mailto:hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> <mailto:hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>>> > <mailto:hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> <mailto:hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org>>>
>>> > >
>>> >https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>>> >
>>> <https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev>
>>> > > >
>>> > > _______________________________________________
>>> > > hibernate-dev mailing list
>>> > > hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> <mailto:hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>>> > <mailto:hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> <mailto:hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org>>
>>> > <mailto:hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> <mailto:hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>>> > <mailto:hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> <mailto:hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org>>>
>>> > >
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>>> >
>>> <https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev>
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > hibernate-dev mailing list
>>> > hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> <mailto:hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>>> <mailto:hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> <mailto:hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org>>
>>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>>> >
>>> <https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev>
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> hibernate-dev mailing list
>>> hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> <mailto:hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>>>
>>
>
More information about the hibernate-dev
mailing list