[hibernate-dev] 6.0 - id type

[Vlad Mihalcea]

+1

I remember that Spring Data CRUDRepository has this restriction that ID
extends Serializable just because Hibernate required it so. I agree that we
should drop this restriction and allow non-Serializable @Id as other JPA
providers.

On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 9:54 PM, Christian Beikov <
christian.beikov at gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 for that. Stumbled over that once or twice in the past and wondered
> what the reasons were.
>
>
> Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *Christian Beikov*
> Am 27.03.2017 um 19:37 schrieb Steve Ebersole:
> > In all versions of Hibernate to-date we have required that the Java type
> of
> > an id be Serializable.  Strictly speaking JPA has no such restriction -
> it
> > says ids can be any Object type *unless* the entity is to be serialized,
> in
> > which case the id must be Serializable (duh).
> >
> > As we transition into 6.0, I wonder if we want to loosen this restriction
> > and allow the id to be any Object type as well.  There really is no valid
> > reason (beyond the obvious case explicitly discussed in the JPA spec) for
> > requiring the id to be Serializable.
> >
> > WDYT?
> > _______________________________________________
> > hibernate-dev mailing list
> > hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> hibernate-dev mailing list
> hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>