[hibernate-dev] [Search] Providing an alias for the indexed type

[Sanne Grinovero]

+1 we should allow to override this.

I think it's material for 6.x , as it ties in with the plans for
decoupling the "index schema definition" from the "indexed type", but
we could introduce a configuration property already in the current
master - something like a type alias.

I probably wouldn't introduce a new annotation now, unless it matches
our intent in 6.


On 7 November 2017 at 16:13, Guillaume Smet <guillaume.smet at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We just had a couple of very similar questions on SO:
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/47107499/override-elasticsearch-type-in-hibernate-search/47160930
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/47160030/how-to-configure-type-name-or-filter-by-type-query-with-elasticsearch-integratio
>
> The first use case makes more sense than the second one but I'm wondering
> if we should consider adding some sort of alias to @Indexed to override the
> type we use to identify the type of an object.
>
> WDYT?
>
> --
> Guillaume
> _______________________________________________
> hibernate-dev mailing list
> hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev