[hibernate-dev] API differences in Hibernate ORM 5.1 vs 5.3

[Sanne Grinovero]

On 22 March 2018 at 15:55, David Lloyd <david.lloyd at redhat.com> wrote:
> This tool is usually pretty good; in fact I think it likely that it's
> the best of its kind.  The false positives are really a fairly recent
> development AFAIK; I don't recall hitting any when I ran it for our
> EJB changes a year or two ago.  It might be a good idea to contribute
> a fix for the problem upstream; it might even be relatively easy to
> do.  Or it could already be fixed.

Good to know, thanks. I might explore that next week.

Sanne

>
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 10:37 AM, Steve Ebersole <steve at hibernate.org> wrote:
>> Not sure.  animal-sniffer is the other one I know, but not sure it would be
>> better.
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 10:21 AM Sanne Grinovero <sanne at hibernate.org>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> To make sure all the noise form "false positives" won't get us to miss
>>> something, someone knows an alternative tool which can do better?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Sanne
>>>
>>>
>>> On 22 March 2018 at 14:22, Steve Ebersole <steve at hibernate.org> wrote:
>>> > Yes there were "lots of differences" but a vast majority of them are
>>> > false-positives, not just those listed in the already massive "false
>>> > positives" section.  I've been going through the non-"false positive"
>>> > section and "resolving" specific items (via strike-through) with either
>>> > (1)
>>> > link to Jira fixing it or (2) comment as to the reason I believe it is a
>>> > false-positive.
>>> >
>>> > I did not bother striking through the "false positives" section.
>>> >
>>> > At this point there are very few unresolved items in this list.  Those
>>> > items
>>> > require more discussion
>>> >
>>> > On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 6:37 PM Sanne Grinovero <sanne at hibernate.org>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Thanks Gail, great job!
>>> >> I fixed a trivial one, just a thousand to go ;)
>>> >>
>>> >> On 16 March 2018 at 23:09, Gail Badner <gbadner at redhat.com> wrote:
>>> >> > I've moved the document to
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jH0znbYwgvGKHC-110zcjRaXLllBsvRKw-pdHrMzRzw
>>> >> > .
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Please let me know if you need an invite to view the document.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > The attachments are still at  https://developer.jboss.org/wiki/
>>> >> > HibernateORMBinaryCompatibilityBetween51And53.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Regards,
>>> >> > Gail
>>> >> >
>>> >> > On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 12:36 AM, Gail Badner <gbadner at redhat.com>
>>> >> > wrote:
>>> >> >
>>> >> >> Hi,
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> There were lots of differences in the compatibility report, so as a
>>> >> >> first
>>> >> >> step, I've excluded packages/classes that I considered SPI,
>>> >> >> internal,
>>> >> >> or
>>> >> >> "grey area". This reduced the the differences to a more manageable
>>> >> >> amount.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> You can see a summary of the incompatibilities along with suggested
>>> >> >> mitigation at [1].
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> The report is attached to [1], along with a zip with instructions
>>> >> >> for
>>> >> >> running the report.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> I believe there are some "false positives" in the report, and I have
>>> >> >> documented them in the section, "False Positives?".
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Feel free to comment on the article.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Thanks,
>>> >> >> Gail
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> [1] https://developer.jboss.org/wiki/HibernateORMBinaryCompatibilit
>>> >> >> yBetween51And53
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>
>>> >> > _______________________________________________
>>> >> > hibernate-dev mailing list
>>> >> > hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> >> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> hibernate-dev mailing list
>>> >> hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>
>
>
> --
> - DML