[hibernate-dev] SingleTableEntityPersister memory footprint in 5.3
sanne at hibernate.org
Tue May 8 05:42:32 EDT 2018
you're right, I found the most interesting email from you now (reading
the whole thread) :
I'm not sure why the discussion stopped, I'm sorry.
Let's try to fix it this time, to make sure of that we need a JIRA.
Someone created one? Guillaume?
- problem introduced by https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/HHH-4546
- great results applying Andrej's
- the patch could be improved today with Java8
-- I'd like to have some degree of upfront validation at boostrap still
-- hopefully explore an array based structure
-- do not extend CHM
-- ideally have no read barriers at all at runtime
On 6 May 2018 at 22:03, Andrej Golovnin <andrej.golovnin at gmail.com> wrote:
>> So, I analyzed the dumps yesterday evening. The problem is real, meaning
>> his SessionFactory is consuming more than 1GB of memory for 600+ tables,
>> some with a lot of attributes. So for sure, the model is a big one, …
> No, it is still a small one. I work on a project with 2145 tables. And the SessionFactory
> consumes on production systems ca 300-400MB with Hibernate 5.2. I haven’t
> tested the project with Hibernate 5.3. But I doubt it would consume more memory.
> Except the Hibernate team broke something again.
>> but it
>> would be nice to be more gentle with this type of configuration. I don't
>> think it's something new to 5.3 though as it's not the first time we have
>> this type of reports.
>>> From my observations, the problem mostly comes from:
>> \_ loaders - EntityLoader
>> \_ staticLoadQuery - EntityLoadQueryDetails
>> \_ rootReturn - EntityReturnImpl
>> The largest LegacyBatchingEntityLoader I have in the dump takes more than 2
>> Keep in mind that with a batch size of 50, we have 13 EntityLoaders for
>> batch sizes of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 20 and 50, each loader
>> taking ~ 200 KB.
>> We discussed some ideas yesterday with Steve.
> And I have discussed it with the Hibernate team 6 years ago:
> And my suggestion to create things lazily were ignored/rejected.
> And I have ignored the opinion of the Hibernate team and implemented
> my suggestions in my version of Hibernate and saved a lot of memory
> in my project.
> Btw. please ask the user whether he has a lot of abstract entity classes.
> When yes, then ask him if it would be possible to convert this entity classes
> to mapped supper-classes. This may help to reduce memory consumption too.
> Best regards,
> Andrej Golovnin
More information about the hibernate-dev