[hibernate-dev] JDK 13 enters Rampdown Phase One

[Gunnar Morling]

> I thought that the next LTS was going to be JDK 17. Did the plans change?

It could be both actually.

LTS is not a notion of OpenJDK itself; instead, individual build providers
can support LTS for any release they want. The three years cadence (i.e.
11, 17 etc.) is what Oracle indicated they'd plan for their build and its
seems other build providers will stick to that rhythm. But it doesn't mean
that nobody could offer an LTS release based on OpenJDK 14. Also what
exactly "LTS" means (time of support etc.) may differ between build
providers.

--Gunnar



Am Mo., 17. Juni 2019 um 10:44 Uhr schrieb Sanne Grinovero <
sanne at hibernate.org>:

> On Mon, 17 Jun 2019 at 08:17, Yoann Rodiere <yoann at hibernate.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hello team,
> >
> > Following the notification above, I updated CI to use the latest JDK13.
> >
> > I also configured JDK14 so you can use in your builds. It's named,
> > unsurprisingly, "OpenJDK 14 Latest". Please set up Jenkins jobs as
> > appropriate for your projects.
> >
> > Please be aware that JDK14 will be an LTS release, and as such will be a
> > very good target to focus on to solve compatibility problems that haven't
> > been solved in JDK12/JDK13.
> >
> > Just a reminder that ORM bytecode enhancement doesn't work with JDK13 and
> > we need some component updates on that front before we can fix it.
> > I expect we'll need those updates for JDK14 too.
>
> I thought that the next LTS was going to be JDK 17. Did the plans change?
>
> Thanks,
> Sanne
>
>
> >
> > Yoann Rodière
> > Hibernate NoORM Team
> > yoann at hibernate.org
> >
> >
> > On Sun, 16 Jun 2019 at 07:51, Rory O'Donnell <rory.odonnell at oracle.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Sanne,
> > >
> > > *JDK 13 Early Access build **25 is now available **at : -
> > > jdk.java.net/13/*
> > >
> > >   * Per the JDK 13 schedule [1], we are now in Rampdown Phase One.
> > >       o For more details , see Mark Reinhold's email to jdk-dev mailing
> > >         list [2]
> > >       o The overall feature set is frozen, no further JEPs will be
> > >         targeted to this release.
> > >   * Changes in this build 25 [4]
> > >
> > > *Request for feedback on JEP 353 integrated in b24
> > > *
> > >
> > > JEP 353: Reimplement the Legacy Socket API" has been integrated into
> > > jdk-13+24. It would be very useful if applications or libraries using
> > > java.net.Socket or java.net.ServerSocket APIs could test with this
> build
> > > and report any issues found. The JEP provides information on the system
> > > property that can be used to switch back to the old implementation and
> > > that may be useful to check for behavior differences between the old
> and
> > > new implementation. It would be very useful to get feedback via the
> > > OpenJDK net-dev mailing list, bugs via the usual channel.
> > >
> > > *Updates to Release Notes since last email*
> > >
> > >   * b25 - Support Kerberos cross-realm referrals (RFC 6806)(JDK-8215032
> > >     <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8215032>)
> > >   * b25 - Add -XX:SoftMaxHeapSize flag(JDK-8222145
> > >     <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8222145>)
> > >   * b24 - Reimplement the Legacy Socket API(JDK-8221481
> > >     <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8221481>)
> > >       o see above request for feedback
> > >   * b24  - Deprecated rmic tool For Removal(JDK-8217412
> > >     <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8217412>)
> > >   * b24 - New String constants for Canonical XML 1.1 URIs(JDK-8224767
> > >     <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8224767>)
> > >   * b23 - Support for Unicode 12.1 (JDK-8221431
> > >     <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8221431>)
> > >   * b21 - Upgrade CLDR to Version 35.1 (JDK-8221432
> > >     <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8221432>)
> > >
> > > *OpenJDK 14 **Early Access build 1 **is now available **at : -
> > > jdk.java.net/14/*
> > >
> > >   * These early-access, open-source builds are provided under the GNU
> > >     General Public License, version 2, with the Classpath Exception
> > >     <http://openjdk.java.net/legal/gplv2+ce.html>.
> > >   * Changes in this build [5]
> > >
> > > **
> > >
> > > Rgds, Rory
> > >
> > > [1] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk/13/#Schedule
> > > <http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk/12/#Schedule>
> > > [2]
> https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk-dev/2019-June/003060.html
> > > [3] http://jdk.java.net/13/release-notes
> > > [4] JDK 13 - Changes in b25 here
> > > <
> > >
> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/log?rev=reverse%28%22jdk-13%2B24%22%3A%3A%22jdk-13%2B25%22-%22jdk-13%2B24%22%29&revcount=1000
> > > >
> > > [5] JDK 14 - Changes in b1 here
> > > <
> > >
> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/log?rev=reverse%28%22jdk-14%2B0%22%3A%3A%22jdk-14%2B1%22-%22jdk-14%2B0%22%29&revcount=1000
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Rgds,Rory O'Donnell
> > > Quality Engineering Manager
> > > Oracle EMEA, Dublin,Ireland
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > hibernate-dev mailing list
> > > hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
> > _______________________________________________
> > hibernate-dev mailing list
> > hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> hibernate-dev mailing list
> hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev