[hibernate-issues] [Hibernate-JIRA] Commented: (HHH-2645) Synchronization bottleneck in EntityModeToTuplizerMapping

Paul Smith (JIRA) noreply at atlassian.com
Thu Oct 18 23:03:39 EDT 2007


    [ http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-2645?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_28482 ] 

Paul Smith commented on HHH-2645:
---------------------------------

We are seeing the same problem.  Using Yourkit 6 monitor analyser we see this as the most significant synchronization bottleneck.  We're are currently forced to use Eager flush mode (don't worry, we're planning to address that) so that flushmode is probably exacerbating this with constant flushing.

I'm going to see if we can try the custom build using a java 5 concurrent  reader hash map, it's a good idea.

> Synchronization bottleneck in EntityModeToTuplizerMapping
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HHH-2645
>                 URL: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-2645
>             Project: Hibernate3
>          Issue Type: Patch
>          Components: core
>    Affects Versions: 3.2.3, 3.2.4, 3.2.4.sp1
>         Environment: Hibernate 3.2.3 (and later), Sun's JDK 1.4.2_12 (server VM) on SunOS 5.10, Oracle 10g R2
>            Reporter: Erik Bergersjö
>            Priority: Minor
>
> We have had a major performance bottleneck in EntityModeToTuplizerMapping with Hibernate version 3.2.3 and the code for that class in 3.2.4sp1 is unchanged. We have found a solution that solves the issue and would like to get it into the real version. I submitted to the user forum first and was asked to create a JIRA issue.
> The problematic line is:
> private final Map tuplizers = Collections.synchronizedMap( new SequencedHashMap() );
> We have changed it to (using util.concurrent):
> private final Map tuplizers = new EDU.oswego.cs.dl.util.concurrent.ConcurrentReaderHashMap();
> This change alone makes our use cases six times faster. The difference is that ConcurrentReaderHashMap handles concurrent readers much better, they don't have to wait for each other.
> The problem occurs when a high number of threads try to initialize sets (see mapping below). A thread dump showed a high number of threads waiting for the same monitor, see partial stack trace below.
> The code runs on Sun's JDK 1.4.2_12 (server VM) on SunOS 5.10 and the kernel spends a lot of time handling mutexes with the original implementation. That time disappears from the radar screen with the fixed version.
> Example mapping for set:
> [code]
> <set name="lines" lazy="true"  inverse="true" cascade="all-delete-orphan">
>   <key>
>       <column name="col1" not-null="true" />
>       <column name="col2" not-null="true" />
>    </key>
>    <one-to-many class="LineClass" />
> </set>
> [/code]
> Stack trace (partial):
> "Thread-108" prio=5 tid=0x05852e90 nid=0x103 waiting for monitor entry [0x3ed7e000..0x3ed7fc28]
>         at java.util.Collections$SynchronizedMap.get(Collections.java:1942)
>         - waiting to lock <0x89d30788> (a java.util.Collections$SynchronizedMap)
>         at org.hibernate.tuple.EntityModeToTuplizerMapping.getTuplizerOrNull(EntityModeToTuplizerMapping.java:53)
>         at org.hibernate.tuple.EntityModeToTuplizerMapping.getTuplizer(EntityModeToTuplizerMapping.java:66)
>         at org.hibernate.type.ComponentType.getPropertyValues(ComponentType.java:353)
>         at org.hibernate.type.ComponentType.isEqual(ComponentType.java:141)
>         at org.hibernate.engine.CollectionKey.equals(CollectionKey.java:50)
>         at java.util.HashMap.eq(HashMap.java:274)
>         at java.util.HashMap.get(HashMap.java:323)
>         at org.hibernate.engine.loading.CollectionLoadContext.getLocalLoadingCollectionEntry(CollectionLoadContext.java:163)
>         at org.hibernate.engine.loading.CollectionLoadContext.locateLoadingCollectionEntry(CollectionLoadContext.java:150)
>         at org.hibernate.engine.loading.CollectionLoadContext.getLoadingCollection(CollectionLoadContext.java:92)
>         at org.hibernate.loader.Loader.readCollectionElement(Loader.java:1003)
>         at org.hibernate.loader.Loader.readCollectionElements(Loader.java:646)
>         at org.hibernate.loader.Loader.getRowFromResultSet(Loader.java:591)
>         at org.hibernate.loader.Loader.doQuery(Loader.java:701)
>         at org.hibernate.loader.Loader.doQueryAndInitializeNonLazyCollections(Loader.java:236)
>         at org.hibernate.loader.Loader.loadCollection(Loader.java:1994)
>         at org.hibernate.loader.collection.CollectionLoader.initialize(CollectionLoader.java:36)
>         at org.hibernate.persister.collection.AbstractCollectionPersister.initialize(AbstractCollectionPersister.java:565)
>         at org.hibernate.event.def.DefaultInitializeCollectionEventListener.onInitializeCollection(DefaultInitializeCollectionEventListener.java:60)
>         at org.hibernate.impl.SessionImpl.initializeCollection(SessionImpl.java:1716)
>         at org.hibernate.collection.AbstractPersistentCollection.initialize(AbstractPersistentCollection.java:344)
>         at org.hibernate.collection.AbstractPersistentCollection.read(AbstractPersistentCollection.java:86)
>         at org.hibernate.collection.PersistentSet.iterator(PersistentSet.java:163)
>  

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

       




More information about the hibernate-issues mailing list