[hibernate-issues] [Hibernate-JIRA] Commented: (HHH-3671) The revision type field is not persisted when setting a custom revision type field name throught the properties
Adam Warski (JIRA)
noreply at atlassian.com
Thu Jan 8 16:28:38 EST 2009
[ http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-3671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=32087#action_32087 ]
Adam Warski commented on HHH-3671:
----------------------------------
Hello,
yes, that is most probably the thing :).
You are using JOINED inheritance, right? If so, the child table only needs columns to reference the primary key of the parent table - which constis of the revision number and the original id. It is enough to store the revision type in the parent table.
--
Adam
> The revision type field is not persisted when setting a custom revision type field name throught the properties
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HHH-3671
> URL: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-3671
> Project: Hibernate Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: envers
> Reporter: Adam Warski
> Assignee: Adam Warski
> Fix For: 3.4
>
>
> http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4197239#4197239
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
More information about the hibernate-issues
mailing list