[hibernate-issues] [Hibernate-JIRA] Commented: (HHH-3608) DB sequence numbers are not unique when using the pooled SequenceStyleGenerator in multiple JVMs with the same DB

[Dean Hiller (JIRA)]

    [ http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-3608?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=33906#action_33906 ] 

Dean Hiller commented on HHH-3608:
----------------------------------

I assume with this you have to set up the db to increment by 20 every time if you have the optimizer set for 20 values each time?  is that correct?

Is there anyway to change the sql instead so don't have to change the database to increment by 20..ie. doing a select of 20 values from the sequence instead so that other apps that don't use hibernate are not grabbing a nextval of 40 and then wasting 41, 42, 43 as they don't have this feature(I am trying to avoid modifying those 3 apps)

thanks,

> DB sequence numbers are not unique when using the pooled SequenceStyleGenerator in multiple JVMs with the same DB
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HHH-3608
>                 URL: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-3608
>             Project: Hibernate Core
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: core
>    Affects Versions: 3.2.6, 3.3.0.GA, 3.3.0.SP1, 3.3.1
>         Environment: Hibernate 3.2.6, Oracle (any version)
>            Reporter: Matthias Gommeringer
>            Priority: Blocker
>         Attachments: PooledOptimizerTest.java
>
>
> We have several Application Servers (=JVMs) running each of them using Hibernate-Objects with the SequenceStyleGenerator+pooled configured. In unpredictable time intervals it happens that hibernate assigns the same ID to two completely different objects which results in a UniqueConstraintViolation exception from the database. Here an example with a description where hibernate fails:
> DB-Sequence setup:
> start=0
> increment=2
> PooledOptimizer.generate() with 2 threads (first assignment of hiValue/value):
> JVM-1                                                 JVM-2
> value=0=callback.nextval
>                                                             value=2=callback.nextval
> hiValue=4=callback.nextval
>                                                             hiValue=6=callback.nextval
> The problem's cause is in the PooledOptimizer.generate: when it initializes
> the value+hiValue for the first time it invokes callback.nextValue() twice which 
> may provide values that do not belong to each other. The reason is that 
> between the assignment of "value" and "hiValue" another JVM can retrieve a
> DB sequence value from the callback which leads to an inconsistent "value" and "hiValue"
> relation (see example above).
> A fix that works for multiple JVMs would be to invoke the "callback.getNextValue()" maximum once
> per "optimizer.generate()" call:
>     public synchronized Serializable generate(AccessCallback callback) {
>         if ( hiValue < 0 ) {
>             value = callback.getNextValue();
>             hiValue = value + incrementSize;
>         }
>         else if ( value >= hiValue ) {
>             value = callback.getNextValue();
>             hiValue = value + incrementSize;
>         }
>         return make(value++);
>     }
> I attached a testcase that prooves the described problem (you can see that the IDs "2" and "3" are assigned two times).
> I would be very thankful if this problem could be fixed very soon since it is a showstopper which
> occurs very unpredictably.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira