[hibernate-issues] [Hibernate-JIRA] Closed: (HHH-1014) id should still be null after unsuccessful saving of a new object - but isn't

Steve Ebersole (JIRA) noreply at atlassian.com
Mon Mar 21 13:00:26 EDT 2011


     [ http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-1014?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Steve Ebersole closed HHH-1014.
-------------------------------


Closing stale resolved issues

> id should still be null after unsuccessful saving of a new object - but isn't
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HHH-1014
>                 URL: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-1014
>             Project: Hibernate Core
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: core
>    Affects Versions: 3.0.5
>         Environment: postgresql, hibernate wired up via spring, also reproducible with 3.1 beta 3
>            Reporter: Thomas Jachmann
>            Assignee: Steve Ebersole
>
> I have quite a simple object: Utility. It's property name has to be unique:
> <class name="Utility">
> 	<id name="id">
> 		<generator class="sequence"/>
> 	</id>
> 	<version name="version"/>
> 	<property name="name" unique="true" not-null="true"/>
> 	<many-to-one name="postalAddress" column="postal_address_id" lazy="false" cascade="all" not-null="true"/>
> 	<many-to-one name="client" class="Client" column="client_id" lazy="false" cascade="all"/>
> 	<property name="phone"/>
> 	<property name="fax"/>
> </class>
> I think that the other properties/relationships don't matter.
> When I save a new Utility that's name already is in the database, I get a ConstraintViolationException. This is expected behaviour. But afterwards, the id of the utility is set. So are those of all related objects (postalAddress and client). As far as I understand it, they should be null indicating that the objects are still not persistet. When I change the name and try to save it again, I get a StaleObjectStateException. This seems to be a bug, since actually, the object isn't in the database because of the constraint violation.
> Regards,
> Thomas

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        


More information about the hibernate-issues mailing list