[infinispan-dev] Raison de etre of TestObjectStreamMarshaller

[Manik Surtani]

On 4 Jun 2009, at 08:40, Galder Zamarreno wrote:

>
>
> Manik Surtani wrote:
>> Yes, it was for ease of debugging, and also to isolate the cause of  
>> problems.  I think we should stick with the Test marshaller for  
>> such purposes, even if purely for the sake of component isolation  
>> during testing.
>
> Ok.
>
>> As for the coverage issues re: the VAM, there should be a separate  
>> set of unit tests for the VAM to ensure every known type is  
>> properly marshalled and unmarshalled by the VAM.
>
> I built a similar test for JBoss Marshaller called  
> JBossMarshallerTest. It know uses VAM rather than JBossMarshaller,  
> so that's effectively it. I need to double check whether all types  
> are now covered and I'll refactor it to better show it's job now.

Great!

Cheers
Manik

--
Manik Surtani
manik at jboss.org
Lead, Infinispan
Lead, JBoss Cache
http://www.infinispan.org
http://www.jbosscache.org