[infinispan-dev] Module configuration proposal

Vladimir Blagojevic vblagoje at redhat.com
Thu Nov 5 17:50:52 EST 2009


Yes, I did! Check out QueryParsingTest in query module.
I have also finished 245, not committed yet.
Will overview code again tonight, but I think 245 is good to go as well.

Cheers

On 09-11-05 5:35 PM, Manik Surtani wrote:
> Wow that was quick, dude! :) I haven't had a chance to have a look
> yet, have you set up a config bean for the query module as an example
> of this?
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 5 Nov 2009, at 16:29, Vladimir Blagojevic<vblagoje at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>    
>> Ok, 193 is in. Give it a quick look and I'll see now what needs to be
>> done for 245.
>>
>> On 09-11-04 2:56 PM, Manik Surtani wrote:
>>      
>>> TBH ISPN-193 and ISPN-245 need not be joined at the hip. We could go
>>> with 193 now since you already have it, and then 245 after GA. Or,
>>> time permitting, I could implement 245 at some point next week maybe
>>> and that could be rolled into the GA too, let's see, but it shouldn't
>>> be a blocker for GA.
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>> On 4 Nov 2009, at 19:43, Vladimir Blagojevic<vblagoje at redhat.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>        
>>>> On 09-11-04 1:51 PM, Manik Surtani wrote:
>>>>
>>>>          
>>>>> It's not that I anticipate changes, it's more a case of introducing
>>>>> major changes in a late-stage CR.  :)  Then again, we've already
>>>>> done
>>>>> that with ISPN-251, etc...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>            
>>>> My gut feeling is that we go forward and implement this feature, I
>>>> think
>>>> it is worth it. As soon as 4.0 is out everybody out there can write
>>>> their extension modules, experiment with extending Infinispan and so
>>>> on.
>>>> We use query module as our test bunny and a guidance to others how
>>>> to
>>>> extend Infinispan! For a little GA delay we get a big payoff. I
>>>> doubt
>>>> that we are going to introduce some major instability. I've already
>>>> implemented module configuration loading, just have to convert it to
>>>> look for this property file. The change is not major, and ISPN-245
>>>> does
>>>> not look too hard. Maybe you can take ISPN-245? You could do it in a
>>>> day
>>>> or so since you are familiar with that code inside out....
>>>>
>>>> What does everyone else think?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> infinispan-dev mailing list
>>>> infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>>>>
>>>>          
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> infinispan-dev mailing list
>>> infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>>>
>>>        
>> _______________________________________________
>> infinispan-dev mailing list
>> infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>>      
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>    




More information about the infinispan-dev mailing list