[infinispan-dev] A better fix for Immutables
Jason T. Greene
jason.greene at redhat.com
Tue Sep 8 17:19:58 EDT 2009
IMO it's not worth adding another dep for something that can be created
in a few lines of code.
Jeff Ramsdale wrote:
> Yeah, I noticed the same thing. I was thinking of suggesting the use of
> Google Collections, too: http://code.google.com/p/google-collections/
>
> They provide a host of Immutable collections and many other handy
> classes. Specifically, I thought BiMap could replace BidirectionalMap
> (I've been working on implementing this, actually). The Google
> Collections are very well tested (and widely deployed), vetted by Josh
> Bloch, and may potentially make it into the JDK in time.
>
> Great interview with the creators
> here: http://www.javalobby.org/articles/google-collections/
>
> -jeff
>
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 11:30 PM, Krzysztof Sobolewski
> <Krzysztof.Sobolewski at atm.com.pl
> <mailto:Krzysztof.Sobolewski at atm.com.pl>> wrote:
>
> I noticed that there was a problem with generics in Immutables
> class. May I
> suggest a better approach? (patch attached) :)
>
> [AFAICS the same thing is needed for analogous code in JBoss Cache, BTW]
> -KS
>
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
--
Jason T. Greene
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
More information about the infinispan-dev
mailing list