[infinispan-dev] SKIP_CACHE_STORE usage
Sanne Grinovero
sanne.grinovero at gmail.com
Fri Aug 6 15:19:55 EDT 2010
following up to my previous findings about SKIP_CACHE_STORE, I just
discovered that also using put()
I experience Store hits;
In InfinispanDirectory.java:230 I'm using: [*]
cache.withFlags(Flag.SKIP_REMOTE_LOOKUP, Flag.SKIP_CACHE_STORE).put(
key, value )
as you can see from the following stacktrace, it's loading it from the store;
especially annoying as it shouldn't find anything there, as on this
type of key the SKIP_CACHE_STORE is consistently enabled:
at org.infinispan.loaders.jdbc.stringbased.JdbcStringBasedCacheStore.getLockFromKey(JdbcStringBasedCacheStore.java:158)
at org.infinispan.loaders.LockSupportCacheStore.load(LockSupportCacheStore.java:93)
at org.infinispan.interceptors.CacheLoaderInterceptor.loadIfNeeded(CacheLoaderInterceptor.java:133)
at org.infinispan.interceptors.CacheLoaderInterceptor.visitPutKeyValueCommand(CacheLoaderInterceptor.java:77)
at org.infinispan.commands.write.PutKeyValueCommand.acceptVisitor(PutKeyValueCommand.java:76)
at org.infinispan.interceptors.base.CommandInterceptor.invokeNextInterceptor(CommandInterceptor.java:118)
at org.infinispan.interceptors.base.CommandInterceptor.handleDefault(CommandInterceptor.java:132)
at org.infinispan.commands.AbstractVisitor.visitPutKeyValueCommand(AbstractVisitor.java:57)
at org.infinispan.commands.write.PutKeyValueCommand.acceptVisitor(PutKeyValueCommand.java:76)
at org.infinispan.interceptors.base.CommandInterceptor.invokeNextInterceptor(CommandInterceptor.java:118)
at org.infinispan.interceptors.TxInterceptor.enlistWriteAndInvokeNext(TxInterceptor.java:183)
at org.infinispan.interceptors.TxInterceptor.visitPutKeyValueCommand(TxInterceptor.java:132)
at org.infinispan.interceptors.DistTxInterceptor.visitPutKeyValueCommand(DistTxInterceptor.java:76)
at org.infinispan.commands.write.PutKeyValueCommand.acceptVisitor(PutKeyValueCommand.java:76)
at org.infinispan.interceptors.base.CommandInterceptor.invokeNextInterceptor(CommandInterceptor.java:118)
at org.infinispan.interceptors.InvocationContextInterceptor.handleAll(InvocationContextInterceptor.java:58)
at org.infinispan.interceptors.InvocationContextInterceptor.handleDefault(InvocationContextInterceptor.java:39)
at org.infinispan.commands.AbstractVisitor.visitPutKeyValueCommand(AbstractVisitor.java:57)
at org.infinispan.commands.write.PutKeyValueCommand.acceptVisitor(PutKeyValueCommand.java:76)
at org.infinispan.interceptors.base.CommandInterceptor.invokeNextInterceptor(CommandInterceptor.java:118)
at org.infinispan.interceptors.BatchingInterceptor.handleDefault(BatchingInterceptor.java:76)
at org.infinispan.commands.AbstractVisitor.visitPutKeyValueCommand(AbstractVisitor.java:57)
at org.infinispan.commands.write.PutKeyValueCommand.acceptVisitor(PutKeyValueCommand.java:76)
at org.infinispan.interceptors.InterceptorChain.invoke(InterceptorChain.java:271)
at org.infinispan.CacheDelegate.put(CacheDelegate.java:426)
at org.infinispan.CacheSupport.put(CacheSupport.java:28)
at org.infinispan.lucene.InfinispanDirectory.createRefCountForNewFile(InfinispanDirectory.java:230)
at org.infinispan.lucene.InfinispanDirectory.createOutput(InfinispanDirectory.java:218)
at org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentInfos.write(SegmentInfos.java:330)
This stacktrace was produced as I implemented a Key2StringMapper
intentionally not supporting a
specific kind of key, which should never be stored.
Shall we create a
SKIP_STORE_LOOKUP ?
Or better yet, I think that SKIP_STORE should work both for reading and writing:
Index: CacheLoaderInterceptor.java
===================================================================
--- CacheLoaderInterceptor.java (revision 2171)
+++ CacheLoaderInterceptor.java (working copy)
@@ -74,7 +75,7 @@
@Override
public Object visitPutKeyValueCommand(InvocationContext ctx,
PutKeyValueCommand command) throws Throwable {
Object key;
- if ((key = command.getKey()) != null) loadIfNeeded(ctx, key);
+ if ((key = command.getKey()) != null && !
ctx.hasFlag(Flag.SKIP_CACHE_STORE)) loadIfNeeded(ctx, key);
return invokeNextInterceptor(ctx, command);
}
this appears to pass all UT, but I don't know if this was actually
important for some form of locking.
Sanne
[*] it's not committed yet, I was experimenting with it to see
performance improvements or possible effects on ISPN-575
More information about the infinispan-dev
mailing list