[infinispan-dev] Transactions across rehashes
Vladimir Blagojevic
vblagoje at redhat.com
Thu Dec 9 11:21:16 EST 2010
Hey,
Continuing our conversation related to ISPN-799 that I have to fix soon
:-) In summary, the real reason why tx fails for SingleJoinTest is
actually a tx T being prepared for nodes A,B prior to rehash event
triggered due to join and then committed on nodes A,C after the rehash.
Manik, and I talked briefly on IRC and concluded that it is better to
detect these cases and issue a rollback rather than deal with all the
edge cases arising from handling "tx across rehashes" scenario.
If we do not detect such cases of "tx across rehashes" (which should
occur rarely) the consequence is that some prepared tx will not be
committed and the locks will remain on keys until stale lock cleanup
mechanism or timeout kicks in.
In order to detected and implement handling tx across rehashes I need
your input Mircea. I was looking at recording either a ch used to issue
prepare or list of nodes where tx was prepared. When later, commit is
issued, list of nodes to send commit to is compared to prepared list. If
they are not equal tx is marked for rollback. Same with a hash expect a
different hash might map keys to same nodes. Mircea, can this state
(either ch or list) be stored in global tx. Or you have some better ideas.
Let me know WDYT.
Cheers,
Vladimir
More information about the infinispan-dev
mailing list