[infinispan-dev] Infinispan Large Scale support

[Vladimir Blagojevic]

On 11-03-18 12:01 PM, Manik Surtani wrote:
> On 18 Mar 2011, at 15:28, Vladimir Blagojevic wrote:
>
>> On 11-03-18 10:05 AM, Galder Zamarreño wrote:
>>> Hmmm, but we know there're problems with doing this, right? https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-937 - Vladimir, did you get around to investigating that?
>> I have not found the root cause. Paul detected the problem in AS test
>> suite. I tested his AS configuration in our test suite and it worked
>> flawlessly.  After that, I "outsourced" the investigation to Paul. Since
>> all our state transfer tests were passing I thought its worth
>> investigating AS setup. That's were the investigation died.
> It "died" because we were too close to a 4.2.1.FINAL to risk changing something like this.  Hence my proposal to leave FLUSH in by default but to allow a FLUSH-free config via a (temporary, 4.2.x only) system property while we investigate properly removing FLUSH in 5.0.
>
I totally agree! IIRC it should work out of the box, all we have to do 
is remove explicit checks for FLUSH in transport that raise exceptions.