[infinispan-dev] Fwd: [jgroups-dev] Incompatible change in 3.1.0
Tristan Tarrant
ttarrant at redhat.com
Tue Nov 29 05:43:40 EST 2011
On 11/29/2011 11:28 AM, Bela Ban wrote:
> Yes, I thought about this too, but then trashed the idea because enums
> take up too much memory. Since an enum is a class, and an enum instance
> is an instance (although a singleton / classloader instance), we have
Why, you would just use the Enum when setting and getting, but otherwise
just store your internal representation.
Tristan
More information about the infinispan-dev
mailing list