[infinispan-dev] mixing optimistic and explicit locking

[Manik Surtani]

On 8 Sep 2011, at 14:54, Manik Surtani wrote:

>> Since it turns out quite often to explain "weird things" to users
>> about batching that it is in fact just a DummyTransaction, maybe it
>> should be better to remove the current batching API and have people
>> deal explicitly with transactions (in all it's aspects from usage,
>> expectations and configuration).
> 
> Yes, this becomes a separate subject I suppose.  Is there a need for a batching API at all, won't transactions be sufficient?

Also keep in mind JSR 107 is proposing a concept of "local transactions", which would in effect be the same as batching.

--
Manik Surtani
manik at jboss.org
twitter.com/maniksurtani

Lead, Infinispan
http://www.infinispan.org



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/infinispan-dev/attachments/20110908/ca0839f3/attachment-0001.html