[infinispan-dev] looking again at AS7-3290 and Hibernate 4.0.1...

[Sanne Grinovero]

On 8 February 2012 04:14, Scott Marlow <smarlow at redhat.com> wrote:
> On 02/07/2012 10:25 AM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
>>
>> On 7 February 2012 15:21, Scott Marlow<smarlow at redhat.com>  wrote:
>>>
>>> On 02/07/2012 10:07 AM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  I'm not that worried about OGM (unless someone wants double buffering
>>>>>>  ;), its more about users wanting to package in different versions in
>>>>>>  Hibernate (newer/older).
>>>>
>>>> Even if someone wanted double buffering, OGM was already upgraded to
>>>> use Hibernate 4, so this doesn't apply.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> I think it depends on whether OGM will always work with the Hibernate
>>> 4.x version that is used in AS 7.x.  If OGM moves forward (Hibernate
>>> version wise) and starts requiring a different version than the one that
>>> is static wired into the Infinispan module, the user might want multiple
>>> Hibernate 4.x versions to be wired into the Infinispan module.  I'm not
>>> sure but if Infinispan has multiple versions of Hibernate in its
>>> classpath, that probably would interfere with the custom commands (I
>>> would think).
>>
>>
>> Good point. It's unlikely for OGM to need a 2nd level cache, but this
>> reasoning applies to Hibernate Search as well, for which we often
>> depend on a newer version of Core than what is provided by the AS.
>
>
> How hard would it be to allow a different way of passing the custom commands
> in?  Would this be a short term change in the next few weeks or longer term?

Sorry I'm not sure I understood what you are proposing. How do you
suggest it should work?
--Sanne