[infinispan-dev] TOB/TOA integration

[Dan Berindei]

Sounds good to me, we should have a little more breathing room after the
NBST alpha to look at the state transfer integration.

Cheers
Dan


On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Mircea Markus <mircea.markus at jboss.com>wrote:

> Hi guys,
>
> I've just had a chat with the CloudTM team(CC) around the integration of
> TOB/TOA[1] into Infinispan. Here are some points:
> - the TOB and TOA code has been reviewed in detail by us. The only part
> missing is the state transfer integration
> - there's not a lot of sense in integrating TOB/TOM over the existing
> state transfer as we would not back port that to 5.1 and it would be
> dropped in 5.2
> - CloudTM would rebase the TOB/TOA work on top of the alpha NBST[2](ATM
> planned at the end of  next week/3 Aug) and we'll integrate that
> - first releases of the TOB/TOA would be marked as experimental in 5.2
>
> How does that sound?
>
> Cheers,
> Mircea
>
> [1] TOA used to be referred to as TOM (M from multicast). In JGroups
> terminology that's an Anycast, so we decided to be consistent with that and
> use TOAnycast.
> [2] https://community.jboss.org/wiki/Non-blockingStateTransfer
>
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/infinispan-dev/attachments/20120725/954be671/attachment.html