[infinispan-dev] test number variations

Sanne Grinovero sanne at infinispan.org
Fri Jun 1 07:28:48 EDT 2012


It's definitely not a priority. But if we're all ok with it I'd like
to move tests in the Lucene Directory and Query to JUnit: I have to
update test setup anyway to the new API.

I didn't do that so far to be consistent, but the other benefits are
getting more tempting over cross-module consistency. I'm living in
cross-modules inconsistency anyway as my typical workspace mixes in
many OGM or Search modules, which are all using JUnit.

On 1 June 2012 12:22, Manik Surtani <manik at jboss.org> wrote:
> Hmm - how complex/time consuming a changeover do you reckon this would be?
>
> On 1 Jun 2012, at 12:07, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
>
>> Thanks Pete!
>> that must be the reason; I'm glad nobody deleted 200 tests yesterday ;-)
>>
>> I would prefer JUnit too, definitely more reliable and I'm loving the
>> latest features of it such as @Rule: makes it almost impossible to
>> forget proper test clean-up and fights inheritance complexity.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Sanne
>>
>> On 1 June 2012 11:56, Pete Muir <pmuir at redhat.com> wrote:
>>> TestNG/surefire in combo are dreadful at counting the number of tests. If you get errors, it will start counting failed before/after methods as well as real test methods. You basically shouldn't trust the count from any run except one where every test passed.
>>>
>>> I would strongly advise using JUnit for this, and many other reasons:
>>>
>>> * much better hooks into surefire, eclipse etc. etc.
>>> * much more stable (rarely do I see bugs like this in it)
>>> * you can actually debug the JUnit code without going blind
>>> * much more flexible / extensible, due to use of runners
>>>
>>> BUT it doesn't have the built in features TestNG has...
>>>
>>> On 1 Jun 2012, at 10:59, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 1 June 2012 10:54, Manik Surtani <manik at jboss.org> wrote:
>>>>> Could be due to a bad check-in where someone annotates a test with @Test(invocationCount = xxxx) - I have seen this a few times.
>>>>
>>>> Maybe, but you didn't convince me. This picture is way too unstable
>>>> (overall testsuite) :
>>>>
>>>> https://infinispan.ci.cloudbees.com/job/Infinispan-master-JDK6-tcp/test/?width=800&height=600
>>>>
>>>> I'd rather think surefire / jenkins / testng / our listeners can't
>>>> count correctly.
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> infinispan-dev mailing list
>>>> infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> infinispan-dev mailing list
>>> infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> infinispan-dev mailing list
>> infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>
> --
> Manik Surtani
> manik at jboss.org
> twitter.com/maniksurtani
>
> Lead, Infinispan
> http://www.infinispan.org
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev



More information about the infinispan-dev mailing list