[infinispan-dev] Let me understand DIST

Manik Surtani manik at jboss.org
Tue Mar 13 01:35:09 EDT 2012


On 12 Mar 2012, at 08:03, Dan Berindei wrote:

>> 
>> Well, probably not, because we only want to send keys to nodes that
>> actually need to store them...
>> 
> 
> Sending the whole tx as a multicast would certainly be more efficient
> than what we do now with lots of targets.
> With unicasts we could send only the minimum required data to each
> target, but that computation would be complex and error-prone.

Well, this is what ANYCAST was all about initially, where JGroups would decide, based on the recipient list versus the total cluster size, on whether to send multiple unicasts or a multicast.  But we didn't end up doing this in the end, perhaps we need to revisit.

Bela, I'm guessing this thread was prompted by the poor performance in DIST that was reported, right?  I'd like to profile the test provided to understand where we should be looking in the first place.  E.g., is it the fact that we have too many RPCs?  Or maybe a locking/concurrency issue elsewhere, etc.  If you have done any of this analysis already, we should talk about that.

Cheers
Manik
--
Manik Surtani
manik at jboss.org
twitter.com/maniksurtani

Lead, Infinispan
http://www.infinispan.org



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/infinispan-dev/attachments/20120312/f61659b2/attachment.html 


More information about the infinispan-dev mailing list