[infinispan-dev] Hybrid locking scheme in ISPN 5.2.0
Paolo Romano
romano at inesc-id.pt
Tue May 15 10:58:43 EDT 2012
Hi Galder,
Let me try to clarify this. With Diego we have developed a system for
forecasting the performance (e.g. maximum throughput, abort rate, avg.
transaction execution time) of an ISPN application when it is deployed
on a cluster of a different scale (compared to the current one).
We modelled using analytical techniques and machine learning the locking
and network-related behaviors of ISPN, but we did our work on ISPN 5.0
(replication mode), which used this "hybrid", partially local/partially
remote (and distributed=> no primary owner).
In other words, our performance prediction schemes won't work neither
for Optimistic nor for Pessimistic. That's why we were hoping there was
a way to revive that locking strategy on 5.2.
BTW, we're trying to see how much time it would take us to build a new
performance forecasting model capturing the 5.2 dynamics.... wish us
good luck because we will need it ready in 15 days....
Cheers,
Paolo
On 5/15/12 9:57 AM, Diego Didona wrote:
> Hello again,
> I need this behaviour because I have a piece of software which
> relies on the knowledge of ISPN's locking scheme and it is *explicitly*
> tailored for the locking scheme of ISPN 5.0; now I have to move to ISPN
> 5.2 so I just wanted to know if there is any chance of having my
> previous software working with 5.2.
> Thanks.
>
> Regards,
> Diego
>> On May 14, 2012, at 5:53 PM, Diego Didona wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks Galder,
>>> I am reading again the documentation you linked and I am also running
>>> some simple tests but I see this behaviour:
>>> - with OPTIMISTIC mode the lock is acquired *only* at prepare time
>>> (thus *not* like in ISPN 5.0);
>>> - with PESSIMISTIC mode the lock is acquired at encounter time on the
>>> primary node (again, thus *not* like in ISPN 5.0).
>>>
>>> The behaviour I'm looking for is only-local encounter-time
>>> locking + cluster-wide prepare-time locking.
>> I can see what you mean by differences now, but why do you need this behaivour?
>>
>> What is your use case? IOW, what is the problem that you're having that requires you to get local locks first?
>>
>>> Am I missing something?
>>> Thanks again. Regards,
>>> Diego
>>>> That's already possible, seehttps://docs.jboss.org/author/x/FAY5
>>>>
>>>> Btw, the community wikis, like the one pointed below, are now used as design documents. For the user guide, head tohttps://docs.jboss.org/author/display/ISPN.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> On May 4, 2012, at 5:08 PM, Diego Didona wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>> looking at the code of ISPN 5.2 (and 5.1) I have seen that the
>>>>> LockingIntercetor has been replaced with new ones. I would like to know
>>>>> if there is the possibility to have ISPN 5.2 (or 5.1) working with the
>>>>> *same* hybrid locking scheme described in [1], which was the default
>>>>> till ISPN 5.0 and entailed the encounter-time write-locks acquisition
>>>>> during the "local" execution of a transaction and then their remote
>>>>> acquisition on other nodes at prepare time.
>>>>> Of course I would like to know if this is feasible just by tweaking some
>>>>> configuration parameters, without having to modify the source code.
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Diego
>>>>> ------------------------
>>>>> [1]https://community.jboss.org/wiki/OptimisticLockingInInfinispan
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> infinispan-dev mailing list
>>>>> infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>>>> --
>>>> Galder Zamarreño
>>>> Sr. Software Engineer
>>>> Infinispan, JBoss Cache
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> infinispan-dev mailing list
>>>> infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> infinispan-dev mailing list
>>> infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>> --
>> Galder Zamarreño
>> Sr. Software Engineer
>> Infinispan, JBoss Cache
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> infinispan-dev mailing list
>> infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
More information about the infinispan-dev
mailing list