[infinispan-dev] Infinispan 5.1.x Object marshalling with and without a class table in use and unmarshalling smacking its head against the wall...
Scott Marlow
smarlow at redhat.com
Fri Oct 12 15:53:49 EDT 2012
http://pastie.org/5046919 shows the callstack for what looks like
creation of a new org.infinispan.marshall.jboss.ExtendedRiverMarshaller.
Note that we also printed the instance for associated it with the
later marshalling problem
(this=org.infinispan.marshall.jboss.ExtendedRiverMarshaller at 869fb6d).
I can see that we later use this same instance when we use the wrong
ClassResolver (org.jboss.marshalling.ContextClassResolver which comes
from the above marshaller). http://pastie.org/5046962 shows the call
stack when we marshall with the ContextClassResolver instead of a
ModularClassResolver.
Can we switch to also use the ModularClassResolver in the
http://pastie.org/5046919 callstack?
On 10/12/2012 09:47 AM, Scott Marlow wrote:
> ReplicableCommandExternalizer.writeCommandParameters() can marshall an
> instance of class org.infinispan.util.ImmutableListCopy (as a
> ID_EXTERNALIZABLE_CLASS) fine. If the classtable doesn't know about the
> org.infinispan.util.ImmutableListCopy class, we also marshall the AS7
> module name (org.infinispan) and module slot name (main). The
> marshalled byte output looks something like the following (this is the
> successful case). I apologize for the crappy hex/character dump :).
> Each hex value is preceded by '0x' and followed by an extra space separator.
>
> *class table does not have ImmutableListCopy class case*
> 0x03 0x01 0xFE 0x03 J0x00 0x00 0x11 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x1A
> default-host/distributable0xAE 0x01 0x03 0x01 0xFE 0x06 I0x02 0x03 '0x02
> ])0xDE +?>0x85 0xBF 0xEC 0xCD P0xCB 0x8E 20x9E 0xD0 K0x00 0x00 0x00 0x07
> 0x04 0x0A 0x00 0x00 0x00 %org.infinispan.util.ImmutableListCopy0x00 0x00
> 0x09 0xF0 0xBD 0x13 q0x06 >0x0E org.infinispan>0x04 main20x04 0x00 0x00
> 0x00 0x02 0x03 '0x02 ])0xDE +?>0x85 0xBF 0xEC 0xCD P0xCB 0x8E 20x9E 0xD0
> 0x03 '0x02 0xB4 0x0D 00x8C 0x98 0xCF M0x89 0xF1 d|}0x0A 0x0B 0xA3 0xCD
> 5K0x00 0x00 0x00 0x06 0x03 0x04 0x03 '0x02 ])0xDE +?>0x85 0xBF 0xEC 0xCD
> P0xCB 0x8E 20x9E 0xD0
>
> Notice that the "org.infinispan.util.ImmutableListCopy" (on middle of
> fourth line) is followed by about 10 separator bytes (of some importance
> I'm sure :). After the 10 separator bytes, is the module name
> (org.infinispan) and that is followed by more separator bytes and then
> the module slot name (main). Again, this is the *working case*.
>
>
> If the classtable does have an entry for the
> org.infinispan.util.ImmutableListCopy class,
> ReplicableCommandExternalizer.writeCommandParameters() appears to
> instead write out some binary values that unmarshalling won't know how
> to deal with later. The hexdump for the *failing case* looks like:
>
> *class table does have ImmutableListCopy class case*
> 0x03 0x01 0xFE 0x03 J0x00 0x00 0x11 0x00 0x00 0x00
> Dorg.jboss.as.test.clustering.cluster.ejb3.stateful.bean.StatefulBean0x98 0x01
> 0x03 0x01 0xFE 0x06 I0x02 0x03 '0x02 0xD5 0xFD 0xCC 0xC7 0xFD 0x10 0xCC
> Q70xF7 0x9C %lZ5K0x00 0x00 0x00 0x14 0x04 0x0A 0x00 0x00 0x00
> %org.infinispan.util.ImmutableListCopy0x00 0x00 0x09 0xF0 0xBD 0x13
> q0x06 20x04 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x02 0x03 '0x02 H0xC6 0xD0 w0xEA 10xEA 0x97
> U0xDC 0xE6 0x1C B0x99 s0xF1 0x03 '0x02 0xD5 0xFD 0xCC 0xC7 0xFD 0x10
> 0xCC Q70xF7 0x9C %lZ55K0x00 0x00 0x00 0x13 0x03 0x04 0x03 '0x02 H0xC6
> 0xD0 w0xEA 10xEA 0x97 U0xDC 0xE6 0x1C B0x99 s0xF1
>
> In the above, the "org.infinispan.util.ImmutableListCopy" field is
> followed by various bytes but no module name.
>
> Later during when unmarshalling this payload, we reach code that doesn't
> understand how to unmarshall. http://pastie.org/5043963 shows the
> failing callstack (partially below for your convenience). It seems to
> me, that somewhere in unmarshalling (Object) code, we need to check if a
> class table was used and use the marshalled form instead.
>
> org.jboss.marshalling.river.RiverUnmarshaller.doReadObject(RiverUnmarshaller.java:751)
>
> org.jboss.marshalling.river.RiverUnmarshaller.doReadObject(RiverUnmarshaller.java:209)
> org.jboss.marshalling.AbstractObjectInput.readObject(AbstractObjectInput.java:37)
> org.jboss.marshalling.ModularClassResolver.resolveClass(ModularClassResolver.java:101)
> org.jboss.marshalling.river.RiverUnmarshaller.doReadClassDescriptor(RiverUnmarshaller.java:938)
> org.jboss.marshalling.river.RiverUnmarshaller.doReadNewObject(RiverUnmarshaller.java:1210)
> org.jboss.marshalling.river.RiverUnmarshaller.doReadObject(RiverUnmarshaller.java:272)
> org.jboss.marshalling.river.RiverUnmarshaller.doReadObject(RiverUnmarshaller.java:209)
> org.jboss.marshalling.AbstractObjectInput.readObject(AbstractObjectInput.java:37)
> org.infinispan.marshall.exts.ReplicableCommandExternalizer.readParameters(ReplicableCommandExternalizer.java:158)
>
>
> This is recreating on the AS 7.1 branch, with jboss-marshalling 1.3.17.x
> and Infinispan 5.1.x.
>
> I'll get closer to understanding the problem, but I need to hear from
> the Infinispan champion of marshalling and class table handling. So, I
> can coordinate effort with him/her. I also wanted to share what we are
> seeing as well with the team. :)
>
> Scott
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>
More information about the infinispan-dev
mailing list