[infinispan-dev] Lucene 4 / Infinispan performance

[Dan Berindei]

Very nice, looking forward to the Lucene bench results.

I hope you'll run it with a distributed cache as well!



On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Sanne Grinovero <sanne at infinispan.org>wrote:

> No I'm not comparing with Lucene 3.6 now with this configuration. It
> is well known that Lucene 4 is significantly faster than Lucene 3, so
> that would be unfair.
>
> What is interesting is that when comparing our implementations vs. the
> Apache stock ones while using Lucene 3 we where "very close", often a
> bit faster but not too exciting.
> Now comparing with the stock ones using Lucene 4 it seems we're
> getting into a better position... and I didn't even profile it, this
> is the first run after finishing coding the functional requirements.
>
> Still these figures are produced by a stress test whose primary
> purpose is to verify consistency and no-corruptions under stress.. I
> happened to add some metrics for fun, but to provide realistic figures
> one should run Lucene's own bench suite.. I'll do that next week.
>
> @Manik yes I'm not using a CacheStore, I would presume the same. This
> is why I've created the Lucene-specific CacheLoader, maybe I should
> complete the job and make it a CacheStore.
>
> Sanne
>
> On 29 January 2013 13:14, Tristan Tarrant <ttarrant at redhat.com> wrote:
> > Have you got numbers comparing against Lucene 3.6 ?
> >
> > Tristan
> >
> > On 01/29/2013 12:53 AM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> >> These are preliminary results of our stressor; looks quite promising
> >> as I haven't yet looked into profiling / tuning:
> >>
> >> Stock Lucene RAMDirectory
> >>     Searches: 14.799.852
> >>     Writes: 195.935
> >>
> >> Stock Lucene FSDirectory (Memory mapping on SSD)
> >>     Searches: 9.628.593
> >>     Writes: 105.930
> >>
> >> Our custom Infinispan Directory (LOCAL)
> >>     Searches: 17.815.874
> >>     Writes: 184.140
> >>
> >> Figures represent operations performed in 15 minutes on a relatively
> >> small index.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Sanne
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> infinispan-dev mailing list
> >> infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > infinispan-dev mailing list
> > infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/infinispan-dev/attachments/20130129/ffebc1d7/attachment-0001.html