[infinispan-dev] Introducing builder subpackages

[Sanne Grinovero]

Please don't break the configuration API again :-(

On 26 June 2013 06:29, Navin Surtani <nsurtani at redhat.com> wrote:
> While working through ISPN-2463, and the sub-tasks I was wondering about the
> organisation of the ConfigurationBuilder classes.
>
> Currently, they are located in org.infinispan.configuration.cache.etc or
> org.infinispan.configuration.global.etc. The actual Configuration classes
> are within the same package already as well. To me, this sounds a little bit
> cluttered and perhaps not very intuitive and I was wondering if it might be
> a better idea to have something like:
>
> org.infinispan.configuration.cache.builders.ConfigurationBuilder (and
> others)
> org.infinispan.configuration.global.builders.GlobalConfigurationBuilder (etc
> etc)
>
> Another suggestion could be:
>
> org.infinispan.configuration.builders.cache.etc
> org.infinispan.configuration.builders.glocal.etc
>
> The only problem with that would be breaking backward compatibility, but
> from ISPN 6.x onwards I think that there are a fair few classes and packages
> being moved around anyway. It's just an idea that might make the API seem a
> little bit cleaner as to where it's located.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> ------------------------
> Navin Surtani
>
> Software Engineer
> JBoss SET
> JBoss EAP
>
> Twitter: @navssurtani
> Blog: navssurtani.blogspot.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev