[infinispan-dev] [Discussion] TimeService implementation

[Galder Zamarreño]

On May 2, 2013, at 7:01 PM, Pedro Ruivo <pedro at infinispan.org> wrote:

>>> When recovery is enabled, the recovery manager creates a second cache.
>>> Someone may want to replace the Clock/TimeService for the "normal" cache
>>> and left the default implementation in the "recovery" cache.
>> 
>> ^ Why would an end-user want to replace the Clock/TimeService?
>> 
>> Remember what I said in my previous email: I can see someone changing the service implementation for testing reasons, and in that case, a global clock/timer service that's swapable via system property would work just fine IMO.
> 
> I don't know. I'm being pessimist and assuming that someone in the world 
> as a dark use case and needs to replace the service.

^ We already have quite a big configuration… we should think twice about adding more stuff… :)

Cheers,
--
Galder Zamarreño
galder at redhat.com
twitter.com/galderz

Project Lead, Escalante
http://escalante.io

Engineer, Infinispan
http://infinispan.org