[infinispan-dev] still to do on HR-embedded integration in ISPN-2281
Mircea Markus
mmarkus at redhat.com
Tue May 7 10:44:04 EDT 2013
On 7 May 2013, at 15:39, Martin Gencur wrote:
> Hey,
> so I have some good news. I've re-ran my tests for memory consumption where I store 100MB of data and here's the results for in-VM mode and client-server with HotRod:
>
> Previously, the memory overhead for HotRod was (can be found at http://infinispan.blogspot.cz/2013/01/infinispan-memory-overhead.html):
> entry size -> overhead per entry
> 512B -> ~174B
> 1kB -> ~178B
> 10kB -> ~176B
> 1MB -> ~245B
>
> Now it is:
> 512B -> ~159 (~ -9%)
> 1kB -> ~159 (~ -11%)
> 10kB -> ~154 (this is perhaps affected by the low number of entries stored in mem.)
> 1MB -> ~184 (the same applies here)
>
>
> For in-VM mode it was:
> 512B -> ~151B
> 1kB -> ~151B
> 10kB -> ~155B
> 1MB -> ~143B
>
> Now it is:
> 512B -> ~150
> 1kB -> ~150
> 10kB -> ~149 (this is perhaps affected by the low number of entries stored in mem.)
> 1MB -> ~143 (the same applies here)
>
>
> Summary: Almost no change for in-VM mode but a nice improvement for the HotRod client.
Thanks Martin, it's only indeed the HR server affected by Galder's optimisation.
>
> I can make a blog post once we have this for Memcached and REST. I guess it is not ready yet.
+1
Cheers,
--
Mircea Markus
Infinispan lead (www.infinispan.org)
More information about the infinispan-dev
mailing list