[infinispan-dev] To bundle or not to bundle is the question

[Mircea Markus]

On Nov 8, 2013, at 3:15 PM, Radim Vansa <rvansa at redhat.com> wrote:

> First of all, I think that naming "old", "new" where 3.2.7 new == 3.4.0 
> old sucks. Let's use some more meaningful names.

On top of that there's an 3.2.7 old as well. 
Bela, jgroups protocols are complicated as as they are :-)

> 
> Changing the DONT_BUNDLE flag to apply on network communication but 
> rather to stack processing isn't a bad idea, if it helps performance.
> However, changing the flag meaning to be dependent on the bundler type 
> sounds rather confusing.
> 
> Radim
> 
> On 11/08/2013 11:47 AM, Bela Ban wrote:
>> I think I'll ignore the DONT_BUNDLE flag on the sender's side if we have
>> the right bundler in place. Take a look at [1] and let me know what you
>> think...
>> 
>> [1] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-1737
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Radim Vansa <rvansa at redhat.com>
> JBoss DataGrid QA
> 
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev

Cheers,
-- 
Mircea Markus
Infinispan lead (www.infinispan.org)