[infinispan-dev] Design of Remote Hot Rod events
Radim Vansa
rvansa at redhat.com
Wed Nov 13 05:33:24 EST 2013
Hi, my couple of questions & remarks:
1. Why there is no RemoteCacheEntryCreated? I guess you had good reason
to exclude it but you could at least explain it. For the event lifecycle
creation sounds to me as important as removal.
2. Does removal due to expiration map to Removed as well? What about
invalidation in invalidation cache?
3. IMO, registering events for particular keys is not that optional. If
you allow only all-keys listener, you end up with users screwing
performance by registering listeners with if (key.equals(myKey)) {...}.
4. It seems to me that one global listener per client per cache is
enough. Will the client code register such single listener and multiplex
all the events to the registered listeners? Related to 3. if you don't
implement the filtering by key on server, you should at least already
provide this as client API and do the equals check locally.
Nevertheless, this would require client equality on keys.
5. Are pre/post events supported here? I guess not, but this is
something to note.
6. Are the events in fact async? It seems to me that these are (the ACKs
are only for delivery).
7. The reliability guarantees should be specified more closely. From the
document it seems that we try to support the near-cache use case by
always sending the last update (the intermediate updates can be lost
according to ACK tracking), but the events themselves are not guaranteed
to be delivered. So is the target reliability "eventually synced cache"?
8. As the client itself is responsible for contacting each server and
registering the listener, there's another scenario besides server
failure. It takes some time before client receives new topology, so
another server might join and become primary owner - the client does not
register to that server until it's late and does not receive the update.
Even after the client joins, the server has not tracked the listener and
can't see that it should send the update.
Solution for this would be to keep a cache of listeners (replicated for
global ones, distributed for key-filtered), delay all writes until this
cache is replicated and then keep the event in memory even if the client
is not yet connected.
Radim
On 11/12/2013 04:17 PM, Galder Zamarreño wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Re: https://github.com/infinispan/infinispan/wiki/Remote-Hot-Rod-Events
>
> I've just finished writing up the Hot Rod remote events design document. Amongst many other use cases, this will enable near caching use cases with the help of Hot Rod client callbacks.
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Galder Zamarreño
> galder at redhat.com
> twitter.com/galderz
>
> Project Lead, Escalante
> http://escalante.io
>
> Engineer, Infinispan
> http://infinispan.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
--
Radim Vansa <rvansa at redhat.com>
JBoss DataGrid QA
More information about the infinispan-dev
mailing list