[infinispan-dev] rethinking ISPN transactions

[Mircea Markus]

On Nov 19, 2013, at 4:01 PM, Dan Berindei <dan.berindei at gmail.com> wrote:

> Maybe synchronization support is another thing that we should scrap in 7.0, then?

I'd still allow them (sync enlistment is there for a resaon), but have XA+recovery enabled by default and the batching commit should fail if the tx hasn't completed successfully.  

> 
> BTW, I've also seen the transaction timeout that Radim mentioned, but only recently. I wonder if we could do anything to increase it for the stress tests.
> 

Cheers,
-- 
Mircea Markus
Infinispan lead (www.infinispan.org)