[infinispan-dev] DIST-SYNC, put(), a problem and a solution
Bela Ban
bban at redhat.com
Wed Aug 6 11:19:50 EDT 2014
Hey Dan,
On 06/08/14 16:13, Dan Berindei wrote:
> I could create the issue in JIRA, but I wouldn't make it high priority
> because I think it have lots of corner cases with NBST and cause
> headaches for the maintainers of state transfer ;)
I do believe the put-while-holding-the-lock issue *is* a critical issue;
anyone banging a cluster of Infinispan nodes with more than 1 thread
will run into lock timeouts, with or without transactions. The only
workaround for now is to use total order, but at the cost of reduced
performance. However, once a system starts hitting the lock timeout
issues, performance drops to a crawl, way slower than TO, and work
starts to pile up, which compounds the problem.
I believe doing a sync RPC while holding the lock on a key is asking for
trouble and is (IMO) an anti-pattern.
Sorry if this has a negative impact on NBST, but should we not fix this
because we don't want to risk a change to NBST ?
> Besides, I'm still not sure I understood your proposals properly, e.g.
> whether they are meant only for non-tx caches or you want to change
> something for tx caches as well...
I think this can be used for both cases; however, I think either Sanne's
solution of using seqnos *per key* and updating in the order of seqnos
or using Pedro's total order impl are probably better solutions.
I'm not pretending these solutions are final (e.g. Sanne's solution
needs more thought when multiple keys are involved), but we should at
least acknowledge the issue exists, create a JIRA to prioritize it and
then start discussing solutions.
> Cheers
> Dan
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Bela Ban <bban at redhat.com
> <mailto:bban at redhat.com>> wrote:
>
> Seems like this discussion has died with the general agreement that this
> is broken and with a few proposals on how to fix it, but without any
> follow-up action items.
>
> I think we (= someone from the ISPN team) need to create a JIRA,
> preferably blocking.
>
> WDYT ?
>
> If not, here's what our options are:
>
> #1 I'll create a JIRA
>
> #2 We'll hold the team meeting in Krasnojarsk, Russia
>
> #3 There will be only vodka, no beers in #2
>
> #4 Bela will join the ISPN team
>
> Thoughts ?
--
Bela Ban, JGroups lead (http://www.jgroups.org)
More information about the infinispan-dev
mailing list