[infinispan-dev] DIST-SYNC, put(), a problem and a solution

[Radim Vansa]

Oh, I've missed the subject (I thought it was related to split-brain, 
not regular operation). How are partitions related to this? This design 
does not consider any partitions, just crashing nodes.

Radim

On 08/07/2014 12:50 PM, Radim Vansa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the current split-brain handling design wants to sacrifice 
> availability (of writes) - don't worry, we don't want to break CAP and 
> everyone here also obeys the laws of gravity :)
>
> Radim
>
>
> On 08/07/2014 10:11 AM, ? ?????? wrote:
>> Guys,
>> Am I right that you trying to break CAP theorem? Seems like that 
>> because you want to have consistent backups (end of cache.put() means 
>> that primary node and all backups have the same value) and 
>> non-blocking behaviour (from user's POV).
>> Sorry if I'm wrong.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Alexey
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> infinispan-dev mailing list
>> infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>
>
> -- 
> Radim Vansa<rvansa at redhat.com>
> JBoss DataGrid QA
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev


-- 
Radim Vansa <rvansa at redhat.com>
JBoss DataGrid QA

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/infinispan-dev/attachments/20140807/c9a187d6/attachment.html