[infinispan-dev] Dropping AtomicMap/FineGrainedAtomicMap
Pedro Ruivo
pedro at infinispan.org
Mon Jan 20 06:32:49 EST 2014
Hi,
On 01/20/2014 11:28 AM, Galder Zamarreño wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Dropping AtomicMap and FineGrainedAtomicMap was discussed last week in the F2F meeting [1]. It's complex and buggy, and we'd recommend people to use the Grouping API instead [2]. Grouping API would allow data to reside together, while the standard map API would apply per-key locking.
+1. are we going to dropping the Delta stuff?
>
> We don't have a timeline for this yet, but we want to get as much feedback on the topic as possible so that we can evaluate the options.
before starting with it, I would recommend to add the following method
to cache API:
/**
* returns all the keys and values associated with the group name. The
Map<K, V> is immutable (i.e. read-only)
**/
Map<K, V> getGroup(String groupName);
Cheers,
Pedro
>
> Cheers,
>
> [1] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-3901
> [2] http://infinispan.org/docs/6.0.x/user_guide/user_guide.html#_the_grouping_api
> --
> Galder Zamarreño
> galder at redhat.com
> twitter.com/galderz
>
> Project Lead, Escalante
> http://escalante.io
>
> Engineer, Infinispan
> http://infinispan.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>
More information about the infinispan-dev
mailing list