[infinispan-dev] Clustering standalone Infinispan w/ WF running Infinispan

Paul Ferraro paul.ferraro at redhat.com
Thu Oct 2 10:06:01 EDT 2014


The only other obvious alternative of which I can think is to actually start the application which uses embedded Infinispan using jboss-modules.
That way you don't need to hack the behavior of ModularClassResolver.

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tristan Tarrant" <ttarrant at redhat.com>
> To: "Stelios Koussouris" <stkousso at redhat.com>
> Cc: "Kurt T Stam" <kurt.stam at jboss.com>, "infinispan -Dev List" <infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org>, "Richard
> Achmatowicz" <rachmato at redhat.com>
> Sent: Thursday, October 2, 2014 9:21:07 AM
> Subject: Re: [infinispan-dev] Clustering standalone Infinispan w/ WF running Infinispan
> 
> I have successfully created a "hybrid" cluster between an application
> using Infinispan in embedded mode and an Infinispan server by doing the
> following on the embedded side:
> 
> - use a JGroups Channel wrapped in a MuxHandler
> - use a custom class resolver which simulates (or rather... hacks) the
> behaviour of the ModularClassResolver when not using modules
> 
> You can find the code at my personal GitHub repo:
> 
> https://github.com/tristantarrant/infinispan-playground/tree/master/src/main/java/net/dataforte/infinispan/hybrid
> 
> suggestions and improvements are welcome.
> 
> Tristan
> 
> On 30/09/14 10:01, Stelios Koussouris wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > To give a bit of context on this. We are doing a POC where the customer
> > wishes to utilize JDG to speed up their application. We need (due to some
> > customer requirements) to cluster
> > EMBEDDED JDG (infinispan library mode) with REMOTE JDG (Infinispan Server)
> > nodes. The infinispan jars should be the same as they are only libraries
> > and they
> > are on the same version. However, during "clustering" of the caches we
> > started seeing errors which looked like there were due to the fact that
> > the clustering of the caches contained different
> > info between the 2 types of cache instantiation (embedded vs server).
> >
> > The result was to for a suggestion to create our own MuxChannel (I don't
> > know if we have any other alternatives at this stage to cluster embedded
> > with server infinispan caches) but at the moment we are facing
> > https://gist.github.com/skoussou/5edc5689446b67f85ae8
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Stylianos Kousouris
> > Red Hat Middleware Consultant
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Tristan Tarrant" <ttarrant at redhat.com>
> > To: "infinispan -Dev List" <infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org>, "Kurt T Stam"
> > <kurt.stam at jboss.com>
> > Cc: "Stelios Koussouris" <stkousso at redhat.com>, "Richard Achmatowicz"
> > <rachmato at redhat.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, 30 September, 2014 8:02:27 AM
> > Subject: Re: [infinispan-dev] Clustering standalone Infinispan w/ WF
> > running Infinispan
> >
> > I don't know what Kurt is doing, but Stelios is attempting to cluster an
> > application using embedded Infinispan deployed within WF together with
> > an Infinispan Server instance.
> > The application is managing its own caches, and therefore it is not
> > interacting with the underlying Infinispan and JGroups subsystems in WF.
> > Infinispan Server uses its Infinispan and JGroups subsystems (which are
> > forked from WF's) and therefore are using MuxChannels.
> >
> > I told Stelios to use a MuxChannel-wrapped Channel in his application
> > and it solved part of the issue (he was initially importing the one
> > included in the WF's jgroups subsystem, but now he's using his local
> > copy), but now he has run into further problems and I believe what Paul
> > & Dennis have written might be correct.
> >
> > The code that configures this is in
> > EmbeddedCacheManagerConfigurationService:
> >
> > GlobalConfigurationBuilder builder = new GlobalConfigurationBuilder();
> > ModuleLoader moduleLoader = this.dependencies.getModuleLoader();
> > builder.serialization().classResolver(ModularClassResolver.getInstance(moduleLoader));
> >
> > I don't know how you'd get a ModuleLoader from within a WF deployment,
> > but I'm sure it can be done.
> >
> > Tristan
> >
> > On 29/09/14 18:57, Paul Ferraro wrote:
> >> You should not need to use a MuxChannel.  This would only be necessary if
> >> there are other EAP services sharing the channel.  Using a MuxChannel
> >> allows your standalone Infinispan instance to filter these irrelevant
> >> messages.  However, in JDG, there should be no other services other than
> >> Infinispan using the channel - hence the MuxChannel stuff is unnecessary.
> >>
> >> I think Dennis earlier response was spot on.  EAP/JDG configures it's
> >> cache managers using a ModularClassResolver (which includes a module name
> >> along with the class name when marshalling).  Your standalone Infinispan
> >> instances do not use this and therefore cannot make sense of the message
> >> body.
> >>
> >> Paul
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >>> From: "Kurt T Stam" <kurt.stam at jboss.com>
> >>> To: "Stelios Koussouris" <stkousso at redhat.com>, "Radoslav Husar"
> >>> <rhusar at redhat.com>
> >>> Cc: "Galder Zamarreño" <galder at redhat.com>, "Paul Ferraro"
> >>> <paul.ferraro at redhat.com>, "Richard Achmatowicz"
> >>> <rachmato at redhat.com>, "infinispan -Dev List"
> >>> <infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> >>> Sent: Monday, September 29, 2014 11:39:59 AM
> >>> Subject: Re: Clustering standalone Infinispan w/ WF running Infinispan
> >>>
> >>> Thanks for following up Stelios, I think Galder is traveling the next 2
> >>> weeks.
> >>>
> >>> So - do we need fixes on both ends then so that the boot order does not
> >>> matter? In which project(s) would we apply
> >>> there changes? Or can they be applied in the end-user's code?
> >>>
> >>> Thx,
> >>>
> >>> --Kurt
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 9/26/14, 11:19 AM, Stelios Koussouris wrote:
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> Rado: It is both ways. ie. if I start first the JDG Server I get the
> >>>> issue
> >>>> on the library mode side when I start that one. If reverse the order of
> >>>> startup I get it in the JDG Server side.
> >>>>
> >>>> Question:
> >>>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> ...IMO the channel needs to be wrapped as
> >>>> org.jboss.as.clustering.jgroups.MuxChannel before passing to infinispan.
> >>>> ...
> >>>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> For now that this is not being done. If I wanted to do it manually on
> >>>> the
> >>>> library side where I can create the protocol programmatically we are
> >>>> talking about something like this?
> >>>>
> >>>> ProtocolStackConfigurator configurator =
> >>>> ConfiguratorFactory.getStackConfigurator("jgroups-udp.xml");
> >>>> MuxChannel channel = new MuxChannel(configurator);
> >>>> org.infinispan.remoting.transport.Transport transport = new
> >>>> org.infinispan.remoting.transport.jgroups.JGroupsTransport(channel);
> >>>>
> >>>> ....
> >>>> then replace the below
> >>>> new
> >>>> GlobalConfigurationBuilder().clusteredDefault().globalJmxStatistics().cacheManagerName("RDSCacheManager").allowDuplicateDomains(true).enable().transport().clusterName("UDM-CLUSTER").addProperty("configurationFile",
> >>>> "jgroups-udp.xml")
> >>>>     
> >>>> WITH
> >>>> new
> >>>> GlobalConfigurationBuilder().clusteredDefault().globalJmxStatistics().cacheManagerName("RDSCacheManager").allowDuplicateDomains(true).enable().transport(Transport).clusterName("UDM-CLUSTER")
> >>>>
> >>>> Btw, someone mentioned that if I follow this method I need to to know
> >>>> the
> >>>> assigned mux ids, but that is not quite clear what it means with regards
> >>>> to the JGroupsTransport configuration
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>>
> >>>> Stylianos Kousouris
> >>>> Red Hat Middleware Consultant
> >>>>
> >>>> ----- Original Message -----
> >>>> From: "Radoslav Husar" <rhusar at redhat.com>
> >>>> To: "Galder Zamarreño" <galder at redhat.com>, "Paul Ferraro"
> >>>> <paul.ferraro at redhat.com>
> >>>> Cc: "Richard Achmatowicz" <rachmato at redhat.com>, "infinispan -Dev List"
> >>>> <infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org>, "Stelios Koussouris"
> >>>> <stkousso at redhat.com>, "Kurt T Stam" <kurt.stam at jboss.com>
> >>>> Sent: Friday, 26 September, 2014 3:47:16 PM
> >>>> Subject: Re: Clustering standalone Infinispan w/ WF running Infinispan
> >>>>
> >>>>     From what Stelios is telling me the question is a little bit other
> >>>>     way
> >>>> round: he is using library mode infinispan and jgroups in EAP and
> >>>> connecting to JDG. So the question is what JDG is doing with the stack,
> >>>> not AS/WF as its infinispan/jgroups subsystem is not used.
> >>>>
> >>>> Unfortunately I don't have access to the JDG repo so I don't know what
> >>>> changes have been made there but if you are using the same jgroups
> >>>> logic, IMO the channel needs to be wrapped as
> >>>> org.jboss.as.clustering.jgroups.MuxChannel before passing to infinispan.
> >>>>
> >>>> Rado
> >>>>
> >>>> On 26/09/14 15:03, Galder Zamarreño wrote:
> >>>>> Hey Paul,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> In the last couple of days, a couple of people have encountered the
> >>>>> exception in [1] when trying to cluster a standalone Infinispan app
> >>>>> with
> >>>>> its own JGroups configuration file with a AS/WF running Infinispan
> >>>>> cache.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>     From my POV, 3 possible causes:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 1. Dependency mismatches between AS/WF and the standalone app. Having
> >>>>> done
> >>>>> some quick study of Kurt’s case, apart from micro version changes, all
> >>>>> looks good.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 2. Mismatch in the Infinispan and/or JGroups configuration file.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 3. AS/WF puts something on the clustered wire that standalone
> >>>>> Infinispan
> >>>>> does not expect. Are you still doing multiplexing? Could you be adding
> >>>>> extra info to the wire?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> With this email, I’m trying to get some clarification from you if the
> >>>>> issue could be due to 3rd option. If it’s either of the first two, it’s
> >>>>> a
> >>>>> matter of digging and finding the difference, but if it’s 3rd one, it’s
> >>>>> more problematic.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Any ideas?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [1] https://gist.github.com/skoussou/92f062f2d0bd17168e01
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Galder Zamarreño
> >>>>> galder at redhat.com
> >>>>> twitter.com/galderz
> >>>>>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> infinispan-dev mailing list
> >> infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev



More information about the infinispan-dev mailing list