[infinispan-dev] Feedback and requests on clustered and remote listeners

[Emmanuel Bernard]

On 23 Sep 2014, at 15:39, William Burns <mudokonman at gmail.com> wrote:

>>> 
>>> If you do that you must also provide an abstract class with default noop operations that filter implementations would extend. Otherwise you are back with backward compatibility problems.
>> 
>> KeyValueFilter was introduced in 7.0, or other backward compatibility problem you have in mind?
> 
> I believe Emmanuel is referring to if we added additional operations
> to the filter, but I am not sure what other operations we would want
> to add to it.  If anything we would probably make a different type of
> filter specific to its use case.

Right, say at some point you offer a cluster wide topology change event and send the keys involved.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/infinispan-dev/attachments/20140923/f0621da1/attachment-0001.html