[infinispan-dev] Should Tree module be deprecated?

[Dan Berindei]

+1 to deprecate it, then we can deprecate AtomicHashMap as well :)

OTOH the scenario in the question seems really basic, we should have
some distributed mode tests to cover it, even if we decide to
deprecate the module.

Dan


On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 3:20 PM, Tristan Tarrant <ttarrant at redhat.com> wrote:
> We should really try to understand the reason why people want a
> treecache. If it is just for ease of porting from JBossCache, then we
> should write an article detailing different strategies on migrating to
> the Map before we proceed with the deprecation (although I'm strongly in
> favour of it).
>
> Tristan
>
> On 01/04/2016 18:47, William Burns wrote:
>> I think we should at least deprecate it for 9.0, if not totally remove
>> it (although I understand we probably can't remove it yet)
>>
>> TreeCache seems to pop up a lot with people complaining about it.
>>
>>   - Will
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 3:48 AM Galder Zamarreño <galder at redhat.com
>> <mailto:galder at redhat.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     Re:
>>     http://stackoverflow.com/questions/29673123/infinispan-treecache-not-getting-distributed-properly?noredirect=1#comment59906993_29673123
>>
>>     Cheers,
>>     --
>>     Galder Zamarreño
>>     Infinispan, Red Hat
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     infinispan-dev mailing list
>>     infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>>     https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> infinispan-dev mailing list
>> infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>>
>
> --
> Tristan Tarrant
> Infinispan Lead
> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev