[infinispan-dev] jdk8backported package

[Sebastian Laskawiec]

Would it be possible to decouple Map implementation from our custom code
(like eviction policy or setting max size)? Or the dependency between those
two is too strong?

On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 3:15 PM, William Burns <mudokonman at gmail.com> wrote:

> Unfortunately this isn't really possible to remove these classes.  They
> have additional changes over and above the jdk8 classes.  We could move it
> into a different package though if we wanted to.
>
> To be honest the only reason this is still really needed is for the
> BoundedConcurrentHashMapV8.  I have been talking with Dan on and off for a
> while about even possibly looking into using a different map implementation
> (such as caffeine or something else equivalent).  We haven't looked into it
> very seriously though.
>
> We could look into this more if people think we want to tackle that.
>
>  - Will
>
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 4:34 AM Radim Vansa <rvansa at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> although we're on Java 8, there's still the package
>> org.infinispan.*.jdk8backported in our codebase. Is there any plan (and
>> possibility) to remove these and use implementation provided by runtime?
>> Or have we tweaked them too much, so shall we rather rename them?
>>
>> Radim
>>
>> --
>> Radim Vansa <rvansa at redhat.com>
>> JBoss Performance Team
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> infinispan-dev mailing list
>> infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/infinispan-dev/attachments/20160125/cb044e82/attachment-0001.html