[infinispan-issues] [JBoss JIRA] Updated: (ISPN-318) Locking could optionally be "fair"
Manik Surtani (JIRA)
jira-events at lists.jboss.org
Wed Dec 23 13:43:37 EST 2009
[ https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/ISPN-318?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Manik Surtani updated ISPN-318:
-------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 4.1.0.GA
(was: 4.0.0.GA)
> Locking could optionally be "fair"
> ----------------------------------
>
> Key: ISPN-318
> URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/ISPN-318
> Project: Infinispan
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Components: Locking and Concurrency
> Affects Versions: 4.0.0.CR3
> Reporter: Manik Surtani
> Assignee: Manik Surtani
> Fix For: 4.1.0.GA
>
>
> Would require a number of changes:
> 1. A new boolean field and getter/setter in Configuration.LockingType (follow patterns of other boolean flags here to ensure proper XSD and parser generation), perhaps called "useFairLocking", defaults to false.
> 2. Modify LockManagerImpl to pass this flag into the LockContainer implementations (in LockManagerImpl#startLockManager())
> 3. Modify the 4 concrete LockContainer implementations to use this flag when creating new locks. Implementations that use JDK reentrant locks just need to pass the fairness flag into the ReentrantLock constructor.
> 4. Modify OwnableReentrantLock to handle fairness. Referring to the JDK's ReentrantLock.FairSync may help. OwnableReentrantLock combines features of the JDK ReentrantLock and ReentrantLock.NonFairSync into a single class, so perhaps the best approach is to create a new OwnableFairReentrantLock.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
More information about the infinispan-issues
mailing list