[infinispan-issues] [JBoss JIRA] Updated: (ISPN-808) Provide programmatic access to RemoteCacheManager configuration data

[Richard Achmatowicz (JIRA)]

     [ https://jira.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-808?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Richard Achmatowicz updated ISPN-808:
-------------------------------------

     Issue Type: Feature Request  (was: Bug)
    Description: 
RemoteCacheManager can have properties passed to it via a number of constructors, but once the object is constructed, there is no means to view the properties in effect.

At a basic level, just having a getter method for the ConfigurationProperties instance would be a big help for developers who want to check the properties in effect. This instance is cuurently private with no hope of access as far as I can tell, even via reflection.

At a more advanced level, being able to check the set of properties, then stopping, resetting a property and restarting the RemoteCacheManager instance doesn't seem all that unreasonable.


  was:
The javadoc for the interface org.infinispan.client.hotrod.RemoteCache incorrectly marks a number of operations as supported, whereas the code throws an UnsupportedOperationException when the se methods are invoked.
The methods in question are:

void evict()
Configuration getConfiguration()
void addListener()
Set<Object> getListeners()
void removeListener()






> Provide programmatic access to RemoteCacheManager configuration data
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ISPN-808
>                 URL: https://jira.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-808
>             Project: Infinispan
>          Issue Type: Feature Request
>    Affects Versions: 4.1.0.Final, 4.2.0.CR2
>            Reporter: Richard Achmatowicz
>            Assignee: Mircea Markus
>             Fix For: 4.2.0.Final
>
>
> RemoteCacheManager can have properties passed to it via a number of constructors, but once the object is constructed, there is no means to view the properties in effect.
> At a basic level, just having a getter method for the ConfigurationProperties instance would be a big help for developers who want to check the properties in effect. This instance is cuurently private with no hope of access as far as I can tell, even via reflection.
> At a more advanced level, being able to check the set of properties, then stopping, resetting a property and restarting the RemoteCacheManager instance doesn't seem all that unreasonable.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira