[infinispan-issues] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (ISPN-909) Segments locked during merge
Sanne Grinovero (JIRA)
jira-events at lists.jboss.org
Mon May 30 06:59:01 EDT 2011
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-909?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12605208#comment-12605208 ]
Sanne Grinovero commented on ISPN-909:
--------------------------------------
thank you, that's great to hear as it confirms a theory I had on locking, when thinking about locking improvements in transactions. closing this.
> Segments locked during merge
> ----------------------------
>
> Key: ISPN-909
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-909
> Project: Infinispan
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Lucene Directory
> Affects Versions: 4.2.0.Final
> Reporter: Tristan Tarrant
> Assignee: Sanne Grinovero
> Attachments: rabbit-1-mergelock.log, rabbit-2-mergelock.log
>
>
> We're getting failures on acquiring locks during merges. Here is the configuration:
> Infinispan: 3 caches: lockCache (replicated, volatile, no eviction), metadataCache (replicated, persisted, no eviction), dataCache (distributed, persisted, eviction).
> Node 1: coordinator, IndexWriter open constantly and writing a stream of documents
> Node 2: opens a read-only IndexReader on-demand to perform queries (we're moving to use IndexReader.reopen() ).
> Occasionally when performing queries on node 2 we get the attached stack traces. We then get corrupt indexes (java.io.IOException: Read past EOF).
> We are using the default Distributed Segment Lock Reader, default 16K chunks and no tuning of the merge policies.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
More information about the infinispan-issues
mailing list